http://www.openspf.org/
They have a wizard you could use for SPF
On Sun, 2008-11-16 at 20:45 -0600, Jeff Justice wrote:
> Can anyone point me to a good tutorial/explanation (preferably in
> newbie language of course) of how an SPF record works and how to
> create a correct one?
>
> Jeff J.
This is slightly OT, I am not able to resolve some domains from a server
hosted at thePlanet (Centos-5.2 with bind 9.3.3 )
-
[r...@smtpout1 ~]# dig @localhost bsnl.in
; <<>> DiG 9.3.3rc2 <<>> @localhost bsnl.in
; (1 server found)
;; global optio
Is it possible to have a A record for *.domain.com
I know *.domain records works for MX records , not sure wether they work
for A records
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 11:39 +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 04:01:31PM +0530,
> ram wrote
> a message of 10 lines which said:
>
> > Is it possible to have a A record for *.domain.com
>
> Technically, yes. It is a very bad idea, but
,
--
Ram
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
at
diffent then clear text ?
Thanks
--
Ram
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Chris Dew wrote:
> You could use the ecrypt fs for the location of the zone data - it
> would require a passphrase when bind starts up on the slave - this
> could cause trouble if the slave crashes.
>
> In gen
Alan,
Is there's any way I can encrypt the zone transfer date (without using
any third-party encryption tool)?
Thanks,
--
Ram
2009/3/25 Alan Clegg :
> Ram Akuka wrote:
>> but encrypting the file system won't do the work here.
>> i agree that storing the key and the e
2009/3/25 Alan Clegg :
> Ram Akuka wrote:
>
>> Is there's any way I can encrypt the zone transfer date (without using
>> any third-party encryption tool)?
>
> Why exactly do you want to do this?
>
> DNS data is NOT PROTECTED DATA.
>
> As long as queries
er downgrade to 9.4.2P2?
Thanks,
BTW
i compiled the bind from stretch using only the –enable-threads .
thanks in advance ,
Ram
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
lem i will be more
then happy to assist here.
thanks in advance,
Ram
2009/8/31 JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 :
> At Sun, 30 Aug 2009 11:01:08 +0300,
> Ram Akuka wrote:
>
>> recently i upgraded my DNS to 9.4.3P3 (from 9.4.3).
>> since then i can see the below error more often:
>>
the error.
thanks,
--
Ram,
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message , Ram
> Ak
> uka writes:
>> Hi,
>> my system is Debian Etch 32Bit running kernel version 2.6.18
>> uname -a
>> Linux 2.6.18-6-686 #1 SMP Tue Jun 17 21:31:27
using ulimit -n - 1024 .
where the number 4096 come from?
BTW
the named i'm running using 7 cpus (-n 7 when start).
please advice ,
--
Ram
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
hi ,
i want to know what's the differences between bind 9 version (especially
between 9.4 and 9.5/6/7) ,
where can i find a table that can describe it?
i tried to google it but i didn't anything useful , .
can someone assist me here?
thanks in adva
Hi all,
We have a query related to the Bind9 load sharing mechanism across multiple
LDAP connections.
The set-up and configuration details are as below.
- 1 DNS Simulator using dnsperf package
- 1 Bind9 server(version 9.9.4) in RHEL 7.2 and DLZ LDAP plugin enabled
during compilation. This server h
Thanks for the quick response.
Is it possible to rate limit the number of packets per second to allow for
a specific iptables rule especially of *UDP*? If yes, our partial
requirement will be sufficed.
Only difficulty I can think at the moment of using this rule is, the peers
will not be indi
Hi There,
We have two DNS views (HDQ and softlayer), Softlayer DNS view is configured
with forwarder as loopback. This is working for all zones except few zones (Ex.
Mi-testq03.pt)
named.conf file,
view "softlayer" {
match-clients { "softlayer"; "softlayer-slaves"; "lnxd0006" };
forward only
R: 162.130.128.167#53(162.130.128.167)
;; WHEN: Fri Aug 5 14:21:00 2016
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 89
Thanks & Regards,
Hari Ganesh
-Original Message-
From: bind-users [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of S Carr
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 10:29 PM
To: bind-users@lists.
: view hdq: transfer of 'mi-testq03.pt/IN': AXFR-style IXFR ended
Thanks & Regards,
Hari Ganesh Ram Mohan
-Original Message-
From: bind-users [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of S Carr
Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2016 2:30 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subjec
testq03.fr. 1800IN A 10.224.8.221
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
mi-testq03.fr. 1800IN NS hdqdns.marriott.com.
mi-testq03.fr. 1800IN NS mcncdns.marriott.com.
;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
hdqdns.marriott.com.1800IN A
We are using BIND 9.9.1-P2 version.
[dns@ncldl38036 ~]$ named -v
BIND 9.9.1-P2
Thanks & Regards,
Hari Ganesh Ram Mohan
-Original Message-
From: bind-users [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of S Carr
Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2016 5:13 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc
file "/etc/bind/zones/zone1.db";
};
Thanks & Regards,
Hari Ganesh Ram Mohan
-Original Message-
From: bind-users [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Pol
Hallen
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 1:21 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: view
zone "zone1" {
type master;
file "/etc/bind/zones/zone1.db";
};
Thanks & Regards,
Hari Ganesh Ram Mohan
From: Sten Carlsen [mailto:st...@s-carlsen.dk]
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 2:37 PM
To: RAM MOHAN, Hari Ganesh
Cc: m...@fuckaroun
22 matches
Mail list logo
