3 time more failed
queries than the secondary, while the succesful queries are almost the same. .
I am almost sure that the problem is network related (hardware or software),
but I need a proof for that. Is there any way to log the timed-out queries in
a log file?
Thank you
Techi
packets directly.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Todd.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: bind-users-bounces+tsnyder=rim@lists.isc.org
> [mailto:bind-users-bounces+tsnyder=rim@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of
> Techi
> Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 6:39 AM
> To: bind-users@lists.i
Tue 18 of May 2010 10:58:53 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 17.05.10 13:38, Techi wrote:
> > I have a problem in my recursive DNS servers (Bind 9, on RHEL 5).
> > Intalled package on my system is the latest bind-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2 from
> > Red Hat. My problem is that sometime
Hallo,
I try to setup (=prepare) the our DNS servers for the DNSSEC era.
I have a Centos 5.x with Bind 9.3.6-4. I have one problem and 2 questions.
The problem is that the specific version seems to lack support for DNSSEC
validation! named-checkconf returns the following error:
/etc/named.conf:212
Hallo,
Recently, I faced huge problems with my DNS servers (bind crashed with no
apparent reason). Some of the symptons were:
* Huge number of connections on our firewalls (>15).
* A lot of errors in syslog about max file descriptors limits reached
(currently on system, the FD limit is 4096,
iginal Message-
> From: bind-users-bounces+tsnyder=rim@lists.isc.org
> [mailto:bind-users-bounces+tsnyder=rim@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of
> Techi Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 8:36 AM
> To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Subject: max-cache-size query
>
> Hallo,
> Recently,
ransfer that to our vendors, but, my question is still not answered.
Why on earth such huge defference in the number of connections on the firewall
with the max-cache-size on and off? I still don't get it.
P.
>
> Just sayin'...
>
> W
>
> On Jun 1, 2010, at 8:35
7 matches
Mail list logo
