olution to this problem without contacting the DNS
administrator of that domain? I have seen this problem for many
domains on the internet.
--
Sunil Shetye.
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
1.cyberasiantrade.com. imagesystems.co.in.
==
(no reply, this is correct)
--
Sunil Shetye.
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
e achieve
that.
Is there any option to make the NS records in the delegation prevail
over the NS records in the domain?
Is there any option to not cache the NS records from the authority
section at all?
Is there any option to add workarounds for specific domains /
nameservers like the ones liste
rs.
I was hoping that either bind should catch such cases automatically or
allow some workaround which need not be monitored later.
--
Sunil Shetye.
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
.32.10
===
Hope that this elaborate example clears the picture of what I am
trying to convey. Note that querying of NS records will also have to
be handled in a consistent manner. However, some more thought may be
required there.
--
that we
queried.
As the 'ra' flag is also missing above, the nameserver will not do a
lookup for you for records it does not know about.
--
Sunil Shetye.
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Quoting from p...@mail.nsbeta.info's mail on Thu, Dec 30, 2010:
> Where is the document for these flags?
> I google'd but got no correct result :)
http://www.tcpipguide.com/free/t_DNSMessageHeaderandQuestionSectionFormat.htm
--
Sunil Shetye.
7 matches
Mail list logo
