[IPv6] Managing dynamic /64 reverse zones inside a static /48 (no delegation)

2012-09-25 Thread Nicolas C.
Hello, Since 2005, we are manually managing a /48 IPv6 prefix with a homemade software, our reverse zone is x.x.x.x.0.6.6.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa. We are now deploying dynamic/private networks for our workstations and to keep the IPv6 reverse zone up-to-date without rewriting our software, we cam

Shared dynamic zone on external view?

2012-11-07 Thread Nicolas C.
Hello, I have a dynamic zone on an external view, this zone is updated with a TSIG key from outside of our network. There is a secondary DNS server, also outside our network on which zones transfers are working fine with no key. We would like to make one of our internal DNS secondary for thi

Re: Shared dynamic zone on external view?

2012-11-08 Thread Nicolas C.
Le 08/11/2012 13:20, /dev/rob0 a écrit : On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 09:23:05AM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote: In message <509a8796.7060...@nryc.fr>, "Nicolas C." writes: I have a dynamic zone on an external view, this zone is updated with a TSIG key from outside of our network. Ther

Slowing down bind answers ?

2014-01-02 Thread Nicolas C.
Hello, Is it possible to make bind answering slowly to requests ? Here is the context : we installed new DNS servers but some clients with static IP configuration are still using the old ones. We enabled queries logging to track the badly-configured workstations and warned the persons but as

Re: Slowing down bind answers ?

2014-01-04 Thread Nicolas C.
On 03/01/2014 18:00, wbr...@e1b.org wrote: From: Mark Andrews After that specify a final date for them to fix their machines by after which you will send NXDOMAIN responses. Sometimes sending a poisoned reponse is the only way to get peoples attention. zone "." { type master; file "em

Re: Slowing down bind answers ?

2014-01-05 Thread Nicolas C.
On 05/01/2014 18:17, Sten Carlsen wrote: You might also make a list of those who use the old server, send a message (assuming the management system allows identification) that the service goes down at a specific date in e.g. a month from that date. And then remove it. Threats are not much worth i

Re: DDNS from DHCPv4 and DHCPv6

2014-04-04 Thread Nicolas C.
On 04/04/2014 14:49, Philipp Schulz wrote: Hello, I hope this wasn't allready discussed in the past. I am currently trying to setup a "dual Stack Network". Both of the two dhcpd instances are doing their job, updating the nameserver, but when i try using both of them at the same time some problem