so I want to define a reverse dns zone to handle 172.16.101.64/27. In
the named.conf file I set:
acl bogusnets {
0.0.0.0/8;
1.0.0.0/8;
2.0.0.0/8;
192.0.2.0/24;
224.0.0.0/3;
10.0.0.0/8;
!172.16.101.64/27;
172.16.0.0/12;
192.168
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Carlos R Laguna wrote:
> Hi i am using Bind BIND 9.8.1-P1 from ubuntu 12.04 and i setup a dns
> with two view and a slave transferring zone trough TSIG-KEYS all that
> work without problem the issue here is that the reverse zone (only) is
> refusing querys from out
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 8:51 AM, STEPHEN EYRE wrote:
>
> Dear All
>
> For the past 3 or 4 years on and off I have been trying to set up a name
> server on an old machine at home. Each time I have failed which isnt a bad
> thing as I have used each failure to do more research and gain more knowle
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 1:35 PM, David Woodfall wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am running bind on slackware 14.1 x86_64 for my own websites, but
> also as a standard DNS for my other systems to use.
>
Which dns server are you using to delegate your requests?
> I have my /etc/resolv on my laptop pointing
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Lucio Crusca wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have a Bind9 server which is master for several zones, one of those is
> hcvalchisone.net. Here is the relevant part of its db file:
>
> ;
> ; BIND data file for hcvalchisone.net
> ;
> $TTL3600
> @ IN SOA hc
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 10:38 AM Tony Finch wrote:
>
> Vinícius Ferrão via bind-users wrote:
> >
> > But the prevalence of terms are still master and slave. And I really
> > hope this thing of changing nomenclatures doesn’t go any further due to
> > political correctness.
>
> "Political correctne
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 4:24 AM @lbutlr wrote:
>
> On 20 Jul 2020, at 11:45, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> > When FreeBSD was used mostly for servers it wasn't a problem. But more
> > and more people are using it for desktop use where they want to basically
> > install it and forget about it, never
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 4:35 AM Tom J. Marcoen
wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> Just wondering here, why switching from CentOS to Debian or building BIND
> from sources? What is wrong with migrating to CentOS Stream? Why would that
> be so much worse than using Debian?
>
The OP made the choice. The
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 3:50 PM David C. Templeton
wrote:
>
> Sorry for any confusion. I started with 9.18.4 because I also wanted to test
> out upgrading. Install 9.18.4 first then make sure I could upgrade to 9.18.6
> without issue.
>
> Am I following the correct link
> (https://copr.fedorain
Stupid question: can I publish/query the NTP server through DNS the
same way I can ask who is doing LDAP?
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
h
Sivaraman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 10:08:34AM -0400, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
>> Stupid question: can I publish/query the NTP server through DNS the
>> same way I can ask who is doing LDAP?
>
> An NTP serice doesn't belong to a domain, so maybe not (I don't
. It does not hurt to add the SRV records for common
> services.
>
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 9:59 AM Mauricio Tavares
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 10:12 AM, Andrew Latham wrote:
>> > You can add SRV records for NTP to your domain if that is what you a
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 3:14 PM, Danny Mayer wrote:
> On 9/21/2018 7:56 AM, Ray Bellis wrote:
>> On 21/09/2018 12:47, Danny Mayer wrote:
>>
>>> Putting on both my BIND9 and NTP hats for a moment:
>>>
>>> This answer makes no sense. NTP uses standard DNS FQDN's for all of its
>>> references to NTP
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:27 AM Stephan von Krawczynski
wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I ran across a question I did not really expect. I am using bind 9.14.1 as
> normal, standalone nameserver. When trying to resolve a certain domain I get a
> SERVFAIL (with nslookup). Deeper inspection of the proble
14 matches
Mail list logo
