Hello,
We (my company) are registrar for a domain name which is delegated to
our client NS. Our client wanted to change the NS records (just the
names, same IP addresses) but the registry put the wrong names and
created glue records instead.
Obviously the glue records are not present in th
On 20/12/2010 13:50, Kalman Feher wrote:
>> The registry NS return an authority section like :
>> > domain.tld. IN NS ns1.domain.tld.
>> > domain.tld. IN NS ns2.domain.tld.
>> > and an additional section with these glue records.
>> >
>> > The delegation should be :
>> > domain.tld. IN NS ns1
Eivind Olsen wrote:
Well, I see a few different errors for that domain:
I don't see any DS records for your domain when I query the fr.
> nameservers. I don't know how it's handled in that TLD but I guess
> you somehow need to tell your registrar about your KSK, so they
can put in the correc
On 28/02/2011 23:35, fakessh @ wrote:
>> This is not handled yet. The .FR zone has been signed since september
>> 2010, but submitting DS for child zones will be supported later this year.
>> See http://operations.afnic.fr for more information.
>>
> thank you for taking the trouble to answer me.
On 27/04/2011 15:03, Karl Auer wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 17:45 +0530, kshitij mali wrote:
>> we are unable to lookup the domain "goelexports.com"
>> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 63082
>
> A trace shows the likely problem:
>
> dns2-rz-ap:[log]$ dig +trace goelexports.c
Hello,
I have a problem resolving "manage.logicboxes.com" with bind. I tried
versions 9.7.3, 9.7.1-P2 and 9.6-ESV-R1, all of them return a SERVFAIL
with a pretty long query time :
; <<>> DiG 9.7.1-P2 <<>> manage.logicboxes.com
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode:
registry will soon be ready to accept DS :
http://www.registry.in/DNSSEC_Deployment
You might want to ask your registrar(s) if they plan to implement DNSSEC
with the .in registry.
Regards,
Laurent Bauer
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/
7 matches
Mail list logo
