Hi,
I saw what in BIND logs,
transfer of 'zone.name/IN' from 106.185.xx.xx#53: Transfer completed: 0
messages, 1 records, 0 bytes, 0.367 secs (0 bytes/sec)
what does it mean: 0 messages, 1 records?
what's the 1 records?
Thanks.
___
Please visit htt
I know it's DNS as a service.
But what's the standard? how to implement it?
Thanks.
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org
Hello,
I met a strange issue with adding a zone to BIND that I can't understand
for, :)
I have two nameservers, say they are:
ns1.example.com
ns2.example.com
There are dozens of zones resolved by these two.
But, the zone example.com itself is resolved by registrar's DNS servers.
For example
On 2015/9/2 星期三 9:34, Mark Andrews wrote:
* Did you read the logs on the servers and correct any errors reported?
Yes I watched the nameserver's log all the time when I did those.
They were nothing special happened.
* Did you check that they were actually serving the new zone?
I don't th
sure. we use nsupdate for adding records dynamically.
On 2015/9/7 星期一 18:03, Harshith Mulky wrote:
Just a query,
How do System administrators add DNS Zone records in DNS Servers?
I do testing at campus, and I do everything, by manually adding the Records
Is there a specific way the records a
Stephane, May I ask why not using outlook for email?
On 2015/9/7 星期一 18:09, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
By not using outlook.com for email
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mai
OK I will forward this message to their windns list.
Thx.
On 2015/9/9 星期三 2:53, Robert Edmonds wrote:
Mark Andrews wrote:
Because outlook.com's nameservers are not EDNS compliant which
breaks anyone attempting to use EDNS extensions unless they hack
around this.
Some of their nameservers are
those slaves?
It's from the auth-nameservers of nsbeta.info, or from the glue records
in the info domain, or just from the LDNS?
I am totally confused about this.
I wish I have described the question clearly, :)
Thanks in advance.
--
B. Regards,
Ken Peng - k...@cloud-chin
2011/12/11 Barry Margolin :
>
> If CloudFlare is similar to Akamai's solution, recursive servers never
> see the CNAME record. Instead, when the auth server receives the query
> for the A record of the apex, it performs its own query for the CNAME,
> and returns the result of this.
>
That hears
2011/12/11 Dan Pritts :
> Hi,
>
> using bind 9.8.1-p1 on rhel5 i386
>
> Having a problem with views. My intended configuration:
>
> * most zones are identical in either view
>
> * a few zones are added in the internal view
>
> * networks in the internal view can do recursive queries (yeah, i know,
Hello,
Today I setup a new name system, BIND 9.7.3 with multi-views, zone
transfer are going based on different TSIG-Keys.
I have found a strange problem that when I edited the zone file, anded
a record, increased the serial number, then run "rndc reload", but
nothing is happened.
the new added re
11 matches
Mail list logo