Greetings.
Per chance, is there a repo of pre-built bind code for the Raspberry Pi
platform? I tried using the PPA specified at
https://launchpad.net/~isc/+archive/ubuntu/bind but it didn't support the
release on my DNS server host (buster). I received the error
Ign:2 https://ppa.launchpadcon
Personally, I would consider response time to be the duration between the
arrival of a request at the DNS server and when the server spits the response
for the request out its local network interface, and latency to be the
additional time the request and response spend traversing the network bet
Greetings, all.
I'm having an odd problem, and I can't seem to figure out how to get Bind to
behave the way I need it to.
I have a computer with a caching-only Bind instance (version
9.11.24-RedHat-9.11.24-2.fc32), which is used both to access the regular
Internet and to access the Amateur Rad
Greetings, all.
I was curious about one of the features in BIND. Per the Best Practices, my
on-site primary nameserver for my public domains (the secondaries being with a
large public DNS provider) is configured to only allow queries from within my
LAN and transfers in the LAN and to the design
Isn't this sort of dynamic functionality (real-time presence or absence of SRV
records) what mDNS and the avahi daemon are for?
From: bind-users on behalf of Matus UHLAR -
fantomas
Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2021 8:51 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Su
So why isn't there a way to tell BIND not to respond to queries for which it
clearly is not authoritative (such as these attack vectors)? Since no
legitimate resolver would be asking a non-authoritative server for information,
why should his (or my) public BIND server respond to these even with
_
From: bind-users on behalf of Reindl Harald
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2021 8:14 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Millions of './ANY/IN' queries denied
Am 16.12.21 um 14:04 schrieb Andrew P.:
> So you're claiming that legitimate resolvers would st
Reindl Harald writes:
Am 16.12.21 um 14:22 schrieb Andrew P.:
>> You don't understand what kind of blacklist I want; I want to blacklist the
>> domain name
>> being asked for, so I don't answer for it. I'm not looking to blacklist
>> forged IP addres
Reindl Harald writes:
>Am 16.12.21 um 14:56 schrieb Andrew P.:
>> Reindl Harald writes:
>> Am 16.12.21 um 14:22 schrieb Andrew P.:
>>>> You don't understand what kind of blacklist I want; I want to blacklist
>>>> the domain name
>>>> being
Greetings, all.
I had a surprise on the bill from my secondary DNS provider after I turned on
DNSSEC. The number of record queries on my domains increased by a factor of
about 5, compared to the number of record queries when I didn't have DNSSEC. Is
this normal for DNSSEC? It's been a consisten
10 matches
Mail list logo
