On Wed, 23 Jul 2025, Michael Richardson wrote:
When I ask from the IETF123 network:
;; SERVER: 31.130.231.0#53(31.130.231.0) (UDP)
;; ANSWER SECTION:
d.0.0.f.e.b.a.b.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.f.0.0.0.0.b.0.f.7.0.6.2.ip6.arpa. 7200
IN PTR nic.sandelman.ca.
which is entirely correct.
Probably 3
Then maybe rocky. CentOS is not the same any more. Although for just bind it
does not matter that much
> Thank you very much, I verified and I'm interesting to:
>
> Red Hat Enterprise Linux / CentOS / AlmaLinux 8, 9
>
> what do I think about Oracle Linux 9 ? It' based on RedHat code.
>
>
>
I'd like to migrate from bind 9.11 lo last version.
This service is acting as cache dns server and It' running on Centos 7
server, what Linux distro do you suggest me for new Bind?
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from
this list
ISC funds the development
Maybe consider running it in a container and keeping nice and small with alpine
linux
>
> I'd like to migrate from bind 9.11 lo last version.
> This service is acting as cache dns server and It' running on Centos 7
> server, what Linux distro do you suggest me for new Bind?
--
Visit https://lis
/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
> > from this list
> >
> > ISC funds the development of this software with paid support
> > subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more
> > information.
> >
> >
> > bind-users mai
Well I meant you can run docker containers inside a vm with qemu
emulated hardware, that'd be the bad scenario ...you're right containers
on bare-metal have full visibility of the Instruction set
On 23/07/2025 15:19, Ondřej Surý wrote:
Docker/Podman is just a container, not *-virtualization pla
Docker/Podman is just a container, not *-virtualization platform, so there’s
full access to the underlying hardware.
--
Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him)
My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel
obligated to reply outside your normal working hours.
> On 23. 7. 2025,
Sometimes, when I do reverse lookups on my own /56, I get weird responses.
I saw this in ... April too... and maybe it went away, not sure how.
Today, it's back. I tend to notice this while ping6'ing stuff...
Hosts:
1. obiwan is desktop in Ottawa.
2. tilapia is authoritative DNS server (in Ottaw
I’m not sure if a container will pass through the CPU instruction set
required to leverage hardware acceleration on newer (or even not-so-new)
Intel processors. In KVM, for example, you have to enable it explicitly.
One way to check for supported instructions is:
grep -o -w 'aes\|sha_ni\|pclmu
Thank you very much, I verified and I'm interesting to:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux / CentOS / AlmaLinux 8, 9
what do I think about Oracle Linux 9 ? It' based on RedHat code.
Il giorno mer 23 lug 2025 alle ore 15:05 Ondřej Surý ha
scritto:
> It would be best to pick something from a list of sup
It would be best to pick something from a list of supported platforms:
https://bind9.readthedocs.io/en/v9.20.11/chapter2.html#supported-platforms
And then cross-check it with list of ISC provided packages (Fedora, RHEL-like,
Debian, Ubuntu) if you want a base system that changes less often.
Or
On 23/07/2025 15:10, Renzo Marengo wrote:
Thank you very much, I verified and I'm interesting to:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux / CentOS / AlmaLinux 8, 9
what do I think about Oracle Linux 9 ? It' based on RedHat code.
It will work just fine as any other RHEL fork.
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/
Hi,
DNSviz is showing the issue very clearly so it was not on your side
https://dnsviz.net/d/time.nist.gov/aID54g/dnssec/
regards
Julian Panke
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Am 24.07.25 00:18 schrieb J Doe :
> Hi,
>
> I have a small mail server that is using: BIND 9.20.11 and
Hi,
I have a small mail server that is using: BIND 9.20.11 and performs
recursion and DNSSEC validation.
From yesterday (July 22nd), to today (July 23rd), I noticed the
following in the server logs
22-Jul-2025 23:59:50.347 lame-servers: info: no valid RRSIG resolving
'glb.nist.gov/DNSKEY/I
14 matches
Mail list logo
