Re: CIDR notation for RPZ rpz-ip ?

2024-05-26 Thread J Doe
On 2024-05-17 19:37, Nick Tait via bind-users wrote: On 18/05/2024 09:11, J Doe wrote: Hello, When using RPZ with BIND 9.18.27 and rpz-ip, can any CIDR prefix be used or must they be either: /8, /16, /24, /32 for IPv4 ? For example, if I want to block records with an A address of 192.168.10.1

Re: Debugging TSIG signed nsupdate problems

2024-05-26 Thread Mark Andrews
Start from the beginning. Show the actual configuration (named.conf, K* files, etc.). X out the secret keys. Show the actual commands you are running. Show the actual logs being produced. REFUSED can come from lots of things. Named emits log messages for almost all of them without needing to t

Re: Debugging TSIG signed nsupdate problems

2024-05-26 Thread Erik Edwards via bind-users
Hello Mark & List, Thank you for responding, I'm running bind-9.18.26-1.fc40.x86_64 and using nsupdate 9.16.27-Debian to send the updates, using rndc Version: 9.18.26. I'm issuing commands through rndc to set the trace level to 99 -> "rndc trace 99". rndc seems to work correctly in all other