Re: Non-improving referral

2024-02-08 Thread Petr Menšík
Yes, but I doubt you would like it more. You can always create your own parent zone copy and make modified delegation only in it. Then if it should be DNSSEC signed, you would have to setup trust anchor for your TLD. But this way, you can test any changes to zone in your lab, without affecting

DNSSEC setup for stealth master and multi slave/recursive - Multiple DS keys?

2024-02-08 Thread Jordan Larson via bind-users
Greetings! I have what is hopefully a simple question regarding proper setup around DNS. I feel somewhat comfortable navigating around BIND but possibly am getting confused around the DNSSEC portion. This is for an internally facing DNS, not exposed to the internet. High level setup is as foll

Re: DNSSEC setup for stealth master and multi slave/recursive - Multiple DS keys?

2024-02-08 Thread Ondřej Surý
I would recommend to start with upgrading BIND (9.16.1) to a version: - that's not 4 years old - that's not going to be EOL in just couple of weeks e.g. latest 9.18.x version. ISC provides PPA for BIND 9.18 here: https://launchpad.net/~isc/+archive/ubuntu/bind Ondřej. -- Ondřej Surý (He/Him) on

Re: DNSSEC setup for stealth master and multi slave/recursive - Multiple DS keys?

2024-02-08 Thread Jordan Larson via bind-users
This is/was the plan when I move to 22.04. I did a quick test of this (inplace upgrade to 22.04) but the slaves blew up because I didn’t have inline-signing set to yes on the zones. I rolled my snapshots back and figured I should sort this first. Is this issue easier to sort out on 9.18.x? If s

Re: DNSSEC setup for stealth master and multi slave/recursive - Multiple DS keys?

2024-02-08 Thread Ondřej Surý
9.16.1 has bugs that have been fixed in more recent releases. There’s no point in trying to even start thinking what could be wrong in something old as this. It would be just a waste of time on both sides. You can do the upgrades in lockstep - first upgrade to latest 9.16 and then to latest 9.1

Re: DNSSEC setup for stealth master and multi slave/recursive - Multiple DS keys?

2024-02-08 Thread Jordan Larson via bind-users
Thanks for the recommendation. I will step up to the latest 9.16.X and then 9.18.X and then reassess. Is there any period I should wait between 9.16 and the 9.18 update? Thanks! From: Ondřej Surý Date: Thursday, February 8, 2024 at 2:18 PM To: Jordan Larson Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subj

acl in also-nofify

2024-02-08 Thread Randy Bush
have spent a bit searching but no result. so ... can i use an acl{} or other macro in `also-notify`? i have a bunch of zones where i want the same `also-notify` list. thanks randy -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the developm

Re: acl in also-nofify

2024-02-08 Thread Elmar K. Bins
Randy, ra...@psg.com (Randy Bush) wrote: > can i use an acl{} or other macro in `also-notify`? i have a bunch of > zones where i want the same `also-notify` list. Been running into the same issue and tried to find out. My master lists and acls are identical as yours seem to be. I've been told t

Re: acl in also-nofify

2024-02-08 Thread Greg Choules via bind-users
Hi both. You can't do it using ACLs. But you can do it using primaries. This is hinted at in the section about the primaries statement, but not clearly expanded on. For example: # define a primaries list called "also-notifed" (or anything you like). Define as many lists as you need. primaries also

Re: DNSSEC setup for stealth master and multi slave/recursive - Multiple DS keys?

2024-02-08 Thread Björn Persson
Jordan Larson via bind-users wrote: > Was I wrong to enable “inline-signing yes” for my slave zones? I would assume > each slave would need its own DS key? Can I do that? That sounds very wrong. Your zone shall have one DNSsec key, or set of keys, that is the same on all slave servers. A client s