Re: Best way to handle multiple retries from BIND?

On 26. 06. 23 3:05, Fred Morris wrote: I have an authoritative server which performs a resource intensive operation to determine an answer; sometimes it takes long enough that BIND asks again (and again!). Firing off multiple attempts to determine the answer just digs the hole deeper. As othe

latency and response time

Hello In DNS benchmarking which is more important latency or response time? for a DNS server what is the difference between the two values? Regards, Sami -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with pa

Re: latency and response time

On 27.06.23 16:22, sami.ra...@sofrecom.com wrote: Hello In DNS benchmarking which is more important latency or response time? for a DNS server what is the difference between the two values? I don't see any difference between those two. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://ww

Re: latency and response time

Personally, I would consider response time to be the duration between the arrival of a request at the DNS server and when the server spits the response for the request out its local network interface, and latency to be the additional time the request and response spend traversing the network bet

Re: Controlling which interface named uses

On 6/12/23 2:48 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: note that query-source settings affects source IP of packet, while "ip rule" affects outgoing interface (unless you also configure SNAT for those packets), so they are not exactly the same. Late comment: `ip route` can have some influence on w

Re: latency and response time

Hi Sami. Let me ask you a question. How would you define the terms "latency" and "response time"? Greg On Tue, 27 Jun 2023 at 17:23, wrote: > Hello In DNS benchmarking which is more important latency or response > time? for a DNS server what is the difference between the two values? > > > > R