Re: forwarder cache

> On 30. 11. 2022, at 22:17, Hamid Maadani wrote: > > Ondrej, I have not been "withholding" or "censoring" information. Yes, you were and still are - yet again, you don't give us full picture and you are guessing what might be wrong. > Instead of dumping all data on you guys, I have tried to p

Re: forwarder cache

> Yes, you were and still are - yet again, you don't give us full picture and > you are guessing what might be wrong.> And yet this quickly turned from "why > does cache doesn't work" into "I'm developing DLZ module and it doesn't work > as expected". > No, it's a waste of time if you don't tell

Re: forwarder cache

> test.com . 0 IN A 10.10.10.10 I think this line just have it all - you are generating record with TTL 0. > ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 FTR it's an authoritative answer. Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý (He/Him) ond...@isc.org My working hours

Re: forwarder cache

Hmm.. odd. Understood, let me go fix that. Appreciate the help. Regards Hamid Maadani December 1, 2022 9:05 AM, "Ondřej Surý" mailto:ond...@isc.org?to=%22Ond%C5%99ej%20Sur%C3%BD%22%20)> wrote: test.com (http://test.com/). 0 IN A 10.10.10.10 I think this line just have it all - you are generatin

Re: forwarder cache

On Thu, 1 Dec 2022, Hamid Maadani wrote: [...] I can see "AUTHORITY: 0" in the answer, and now I understand NS1 does not cache this because of that (did not know only authority 1 answers are cached when I sent the initial email. Confusion of causes and effects: "AUTHORITY:0" is reportage regar

Re: forwarder cache

Errata.. On Thu, 1 Dec 2022, Fred Morris wrote: "authoritative" zone served by an authoritative server configured to return complete 1024/1025 responses look like? 1034/1035 -- FWM -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the develo

Re: forwarder cache

> Have fun arguing about whether or not a server which is "authoritative" > should have an NS record in the zone, once you have something which > demonstrably works. > I don't have a lot of patience for "experts" who can't demonstrate a working > system, so I probably won't be back. Not sure wh

Ask for help with SERVFAIL

'servfail' exception occurs after BIND runs for a period of time, restart bind ：servfail does not appear but，After running for some time, it still had the same 'servfail' problem #./sbin/named -VBIND 9.11.5 (Extended Support Version) running on Linux x86_64 3.10.0-514.26.2.el7.x86_64 #1 SM

Re: Ask for help with SERVFAIL

The DNS server at 119.29.29.29 is broken. It does not implement EDNS (RFC 6891) correctly. Some of the errors may be due to a misconfigured firewall in front of the server. This is the section of RFC 6891 the server is not following and it is designed to allow clients to use options the server