Hello,
If we see this on our DNS server logs (BIND 9.11):
04-May-2022 12:55:37.675 edns-disabled: info: success resolving
'sour.woinsta.com/A' (in 'woinsta.com'?) after disabling EDNS
- are we correct to say that with BIND 9.16, that query wil always fail because
EDNS won't be disabled anymore
> On 4. 5. 2022, at 14:12, Veronique Lefebure
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> If we see this on our DNS server logs (BIND 9.11):
>
> 04-May-2022 12:55:37.675 edns-disabled: info: success resolving
> 'sour.woinsta.com/A' (in 'woinsta.com'?) after disabling EDNS
>
> - are we correct to say that with B
Hi Veronique.
Every DNS server should support EDNS by now. It has been around for a very
long time. Even if it doesn't support EDNS it should ignore it.
I made some test queries and packet captures to 23.82.12.28. Whatever this
box is, please talk to the manufacturer about EDNS support.
Or.. it ma
On 04. 05. 22 14:34, Greg Choules via bind-users wrote:
Hi Veronique.
Every DNS server should support EDNS by now. It has been around for a
very long time. Even if it doesn't support EDNS it should ignore it.
I made some test queries and packet captures to 23.82.12.28. Whatever
this box is, p
Thanks Greg and Ondrej,
Many thanks for the pointer to DNS Cookies in BIND 9 (isc.org)
https://kb.isc.org/docs/aa-01387
I have used https://ednscomp.isc.org/ednscomp/1ba42afa27 to check if they are
compliant, but the answer is ambiguous:
EDNS Compliance Tester
Checking: 'sour.woinsta.com' as
> On 5 May 2022, at 00:17, Veronique Lefebure
> wrote:
>
> Thanks Greg and Ondrej,
>
> Many thanks for the pointer to DNS Cookies in BIND 9 (isc.org)
>
> I have used https://ednscomp.isc.org/ednscomp/1ba42afa27 to check if they
> are compliant, but the answer is ambiguous:
>
> EDNS Complia
6 matches
Mail list logo
