Hello,
I am currently rolling the 9.16.21 on a few bind servers. Most of the
servers rolled the update correctly except for one in particular (this is a
primary server of 2 other secondaries).
Here is the issue logged
Sep 23 10:42:07 host named[22788]: zoneload: zone [...]/IN: loading from
maste
Hi,
we cannot really help you if anonymize everything and don’t provide any details
at all.
Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý (He/Him)
ond...@isc.org
> On 23. 9. 2021, at 10:54, Thib D wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am currently rolling the 9.16.21 on a few bind servers. Most of the servers
> rolled the updat
Can some one please help me on this
From: Sonal Pahuja
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 10:26:48 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: CNAME query
Hi All,
We are sending a CNAME query but currently we don’t have any CNAME record, just
have NS info.
What
Sonal,
How do you expect anyone to help you when you ask such a vague question?
If you want help, the least you can do is ask a question properly. It
only takes 2 more minutes to describe a situation more accurately, so
please stop taking shortcuts, and try again, with a more detailed
questio
+1
you set two forwarders ( possibly the same machine )
On 23/09/2021 7:47 pm, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
Sonal,
How do you expect anyone to help you when you ask such a vague
question? If you want help, the least you can do is ask a question
properly. It only takes 2 more minutes to describe a
Hi Ondrej,
Thanks for your reply,
I'm afraid I am unable to share any more detail regarding the zone content
because it's customer data. I will use example.com and try to make the most
sense out of the issue.
Our upgrading procedure is to recompile the binaries provided in
https://ftp.isc.org/is
Don't know if that helps, but if I query my local Bind DNS for a CNAME,
that doesn't exists, dig gives me the SOA record:
> dig cname nonexisting.example.com @mydns
; <<>> DiG 9.16.6 <<>> cname nonexisting.example.com @mydns
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY,
Thanks a lot Danilo for understanding my query! This is what i was looking for!
From: bind-users on behalf of Danilo Godec
via bind-users
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 17:27
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: [External] : Re: CNAME query
Don't know if t
Hi Thib,
thanks, this is much better and I can now safely say, this has been already
reported and tracked as https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/issues/2911
The only thing weird is:
> Then, I tried switching from
> check-names master warn;
> to
> check-names primary warn;
This should
> Don't know if that helps, but if I query my local Bind DNS for a CNAME,
> that doesn't exists, dig gives me the SOA record:
>
>> dig cname nonexisting.example.com @mydns
>
> ; <<>> DiG 9.16.6 <<>> cname nonexisting.example.com @mydns
> ;; global options: +cmd
> ;; Got answer:
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- op
On 23.09.21 06:18, Sonal Pahuja wrote:
We have configured a forward zone in bind9 for e164.arpa and in forwarders we
are giving 2 IPs.
Just wanted to know the mechanism/routing/ Load balancing policy by which bind9
forwarding to different IPs.
I can see sometimes it routes to same IP alway
Parkin, Richard (R.) wrote:
>
> I’d like to understand how much traffic is flowing to each forwarder
> (QPS, etc) and monitor that for any issues. Is there a way to do that
> effectively in Bind without putting some kind of network device on the
> outbound path to measure it? If not, does anyone
> This should be the right workaround at this moment, so I wonder why it
didn’t work.
It seems like it does after all, I messed up my checks. Thanks.
However our procedure runs named-checkconf before restarting named, and no
error is brought up when running it, I'm guessing this should be mention
Sonal Pahuja wrote:
>
> We are sending a CNAME query but currently we don't have any CNAME
> record, just have NS info. What should be the Bind9 response for this
> CNAME query? Will it return NS Record in Authority/Answer section?
In general, applications should not make CNAME queries because th
Hi,
I am using bind 9.16.21 on ubuntu. When I am running dnsperf against that,
always load is going one CPU core, because of this issue, I am seeing less
QPS. Has anyone faced the same issue? Could you please someone look into
this and help me with this?
Regards,
Ramesh
___
Hi,
I am using bind 9.16.21 on ubuntu. When I am running dnsperf against that,
always load is going one CPU core, because of this issue, I am seeing less
QPS. Has anyone faced the same issue? Could you please someone look into
this and help me with this?
Regards,
Ramesh
___
16 matches
Mail list logo
