> On 10 Sep 2021, at 13:30, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
>
> On 9/10/21 12:35, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
>
>> Freebsd 12.2-STABLE here with servers running BIND 9.16.15, 9.16.18
>> and 9.16.20, all using libuv 1.41.0, all installed from ports. Typical
>> query load from around 3k qps to around 14k q
On 9/13/21 09:12, Borja Marcos wrote:
2- Adding a bogus 127.10.whatever to the spare Ethernet interface I am not
using, per a previous comment on
this thread about a memory leak due to interfaces with no addresses.
This issue does need to get fixed. Assigning random, unused IP addresses
to
Hello All,
Currently we are facing below issue:-
We have built a response for NS query and sending it to bind9. But however
bind9 is rejecting and getting server fail error
In named.run getting below output:-
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/m
Hi,
if you have reliable reproducer, please fill an issue at
https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/issues
While this mailing list is monitored by the BIND 9 team, it’s more practical to
have an issue filled by
a person experiencing the problem where we can interact directly and ask
addit
> On 13 Sep 2021, at 09:40, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> if you have reliable reproducer, please fill an issue at
> https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/issues
>
> While this mailing list is monitored by the BIND 9 team, it’s more practical
> to have an issue filled by
> a person e
Hello All,
Currently we are facing below issue:-
We have built a response for NS query and sending it to bind9. But however
bind9 is rejecting and getting server fail error.
NAPTR and CNAME queries are working fine.
Wireshark of response built by our application:
[cid:image003.jpg@01D7A8A4.B45
Hi Sonal,
> On 13. 9. 2021, at 10:09, Sonal Pahuja wrote:
>
> Kindly let us know what can be issue here.
DNS is hard. My recommendation would be to not write your own DNS server,
but use an existing implementation that could be extended. Perhaps if you
share your design goals, we could help you
Hello Sonal,
are those queries done on internal network only? If global public DNS
root is used, how did bind9 found it should contact your server? Is it
configured via forward zone?
Public zone uses DNSSEC and bind9 does validate by default. I think your
problem is too short authority zone of SO
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6891
--
Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him)
My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel
obligated to reply outside your normal working hours.
> On 13. 9. 2021, at 14:31, Petr Menšík wrote:
>
>
> Hello Sonal,
>
> are those que
EDNS0 would be my first guess. It’s very hard to tell without debugging output
from `named`.
But let me rephrase my response: If this is for an experiment or a school
project I would be happy to help, but if the goal is to unleash yet another
incomplete DNS server implementation then I would be
10 matches
Mail list logo
