Hi Richard,
I will return to this problem with 8 vCPU count. You wrote earlier that there
could be a way to have BIND run a specific number of vCPU cores?
Because with the current setup we cannot change the server's vCPU count.
BR, Sami Leino / Q-Net Oy
Lähettäjä: bind-users Puolesta Sami Le
Hi there,
On Wed, 8 Sep 2021, Sami Leino wrote:
I will return to this problem with 8 vCPU count. You wrote earlier
that there could be a way to have BIND run a specific number of vCPU
cores?
Have you tried searching something like "windows processor affinity"?
--
73,
Ged.
__
Hi Sami,
I'm sorry but I've tried to do that again this evening but I can't get it to
work.
named.exe can take command line arguments to limit the number of vCPUs it will
use, but I can't get this to work when running named.exe as a service.
It *should* be the case that you can edit the follow
2.5 days in, and 9.11 is still running good, with no crashing.
Safe to say that this memory leak is definitely an issue with 9.16.
Mark.
On 9/6/21 19:30, Mark Tinka wrote:
So I've decided to downgrade our busiest resolvers to bind911-9.11.35.
Mark.
__
4 matches
Mail list logo