Re: How do I identify if bind9 is using 4 cores?

Hi Petr, this is a side effect of libuv threadpool which inherits the name of the “parent” thread (but then it’s shared between all of them). If you use gdb on the `named`, you’ll see that those extra threads are waiting for work in the uv threadpool: (gdb) bt #0 futex_wait_cancelable (privat

Re: ITS THE NUMBER OF CORES/THREADS

Hi, FTR I spent some time today trying to reproduce the issue and I can’t reproduce it locally, so it must be something else than just simple number of workers. The associated issue is here: https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/issues/2837 If anybody experiencing the issue was to go thr

response policy zones (rpz) and views - memory consumption

Hi, I’ve read many archived mails here and I haven’t found solution / answer, so let me ask you guys. I’m running Bind 9.11+ and using views for around 10 clients on single server, all clients has different settings and everything was working great, until we’ve decided to implement RPZ for

Re: Using catz (catalog zones): BIND does not remove the catz-journal file on the slave

Opened issue: https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/issues/2842 > On 28 Jul 2021, at 23:38, Tom wrote: > > Hi > > Using BIND-9.16.19: When removing a member zone from a catz (catalog zone), > then the journal files are not removed on the slave: > > Current situation before removing the