Running bind 9.16.15 on FreeBSD 11.4-STABLE.
Master is out on a cloud server at Digital Ocean. Slave is on-premise.
All on-prem LANs point to the slave instance.
Running split horizon to keep nosey parkers out of our local DNS assignments.
Recently - and for no obvious reason - the on-prem inst
On 20/05/2021 15:30, Tim Daneliuk via bind-users wrote:
Hi Tim,
> Recently - and for no obvious reason - the on-prem instance stops resolving
> properly. The fix is to stop it, clear out the slave files, and restart.
> Then it works for a few days and repeats its misbehavior.
>
> The logs show
On 20/05/2021 00:06, Michael McNally wrote:
Hi ISC people,
> RELEASE-NOTES-bind-9.16.16.html
I was just reading the release notes, and noticed:
"The default value of the max-ixfr-ratio option was changed to
unlimited, for better backwards compatibility in the stable release series."
Thank you
Hi Team,
Are those new versions available in Linux distro packages?
--
Thanks and Regards,
Manish R
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 8:08 PM Anand Buddhdev wrote:
> On 20/05/2021 00:06, Michael McNally wrote:
>
> Hi ISC people,
>
>
On 20/05/2021 17:22, Manish Rane wrote:
> Are those new versions available in Linux distro packages?
Bleeding-edge distros like Gentoo Linux will probably have packages
within a short time. If you use Homebrew on your system, you'll also
have the newest version soonish.
Most of the major distrib
On 5/20/21 8:43 AM, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
> On 20/05/2021 15:30, Tim Daneliuk via bind-users wrote:
>
> Hi Tim,
>
>> Recently - and for no obvious reason - the on-prem instance stops resolving
>> properly. The fix is to stop it, clear out the slave files, and restart.
>> Then it works for a few
Nevertheless I think there is a bug. IIR the previous default was 100% (switch
to AXFR if IXFR would be grater than AXFR) and we also saw plenty of AXFR
although the IXFR difference was very small and far away from 100%
regards
Klaus
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: bind-users Im Auf
On 20/05/2021 18:08, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Hi Klaus,
> Nevertheless I think there is a bug. IIR the previous default was
> 100% (switch to AXFR if IXFR would be grater than AXFR) and we also saw
> plenty of AXFR although the IXFR difference was very small and far away
> from 100%
Yes, I agree. I
Well, yes, that’s why the default was reverted. There’s a bug in the feature,
and there’s already MR fixing it. Sorry for the inconvenience.
If anybody is willing to test the fix, I would be happy to point them towards
the MR (and patch).
Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him)
My working hours a
Thanks for the reply
--
Thanks and Regards,
Manish R
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 9:15 PM Anand Buddhdev wrote:
> On 20/05/2021 17:22, Manish Rane wrote:
>
> > Are those new versions available in Linux distro packages?
>
> Bleed
Many years ago, when we ran ISC BIND on Solaris, we created a logging
channel to send the logged-queries to the local syslogd. We then had our
local syslogd forward most of the traffic on to a central syslog server.
I just tried to re-implement something like that on CentOS, and thought
I had
On 20/05/2021 23:34, John Thurston wrote:
Hi John,
> My subsequent read of the docs indicates that BIND on CentOS 7, while
> being told it is sending to 'syslogd', is sending to 'journald' which is
> handling all the messages and forwarding them on to 'syslogd'. I don't
> want journald handling m
If you can have BIND log directly to a file, couldn't you use a FIFO
(prwxrwxrwx) or Unix domain socket (srwxrwxrwx) and avoid the disk I/O by
sending the log data directly to the forwarder? (E.g., Pulse Audio listens on a
socket for audio data from an application, and sends it in real-time to t
On 20.05.21 17:22, Manish Rane wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> Are those new versions available in Linux distro packages?
As Anand already wrote: our Enterprise releases won't have this atm,
unless you request it through the official channels.
OpenSUSE Tumbleweed will hopefully have in a few days.
Josef
>
I already tried the official Repository on my existing Ubuntu 18.04 and it
worked perfectly.
--
Thanks and Regards,
Manish R
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 11:02 AM Josef Moellers wrote:
> On 20.05.21 17:22, Manish Rane wrote:
> >
15 matches
Mail list logo
