Does BIND take advantage of net.core.rmem_max on Linux boxes?
If I set the rmem_max to 12.5mb but leave the rmem_default as the OS
default will I see a benefit on a high QPS DNS server?
Or does BIND look to the rmem_default and ignore the rmem_max?
--
-Ben Croswell
__
Am 08.11.20 um 14:44 schrieb Timothe Litt:
I'm amazed that this thread has persisted for so long on this list of
knowledgeable people
me too, i would understand that on the spamassassin list but not here
and what i *really* don't understand is jumping into the thread with "I
just wanted
Thank you for your valuable feedback. It is much appreciated.
On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 at 19:37, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 08.11.20 um 14:44 schrieb Timothe Litt:
>
>
> I'm amazed that this thread has persisted for so long on this list of
> knowledgeable people
>
>
> me too, i would understand that
My fix for the DNS lookup problems I reported a few days ago, based on help
here, seems to mostly work. But there is one oddity. When the tunnel goes
down I comment out the special handling for the zone I reach through the tunnel
and reload the server. But my DNS queries return the same inter
4 matches
Mail list logo