> Does BIND have a DoH plugin official?
> Or is there any guide to customize that one?
Not yet, but we plan to have a DoH implementation in named by the end of
this year.
In the meantime, there are DoH proxies that can run BIND as the back-end.
--
Evan Hunt -- e...@isc.org
Internet Systems Cons
Hi all,
the doc says each node has a set of resource information, which may be empty.
But how do I create such a node? If I just write, say:
an-emty-name.example.com.
named-checkzone complains about unexpected end of input.
NULL is not usable in master files. For the time being, I try:
Hi,
to create a empty non-terminal (ENT) you should do:
non-empty.an-empty-name.example.com. IN TXT
Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý
ond...@isc.org
> On 29 Apr 2020, at 12:22, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> the doc says each node has a set of resource information, which may be empty.
> But h
Great!
Thank you Ondrej
Ale
On 29/04/2020 12:26, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Hi,
>
> to create a empty non-terminal (ENT) you should do:
>
> non-empty.an-empty-name.example.com. IN TXT
>
> Ondrej
> --
> Ondřej Surý
> ond...@isc.org
>
>> On 29 Apr 2020, at 12:22, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>>
>> Hi
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 5:23 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the doc says each node has a set of resource information, which may be
> empty.
> But how do I create such a node? If I just write, say:
>
> an-emty-name.example.com.
>
I believe that's a reference to empty non-terminals
Walter Peng wrote:
>
> Does BIND have a DoH plugin official?
> Or is there any guide to customize that one?
You'll need to run a DoH proxy in front of BIND, for example
https://dnsdist.org/ - my DoH service uses
https://dotat.at/cgi/git/doh101.git
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/
On that subject, how about DoT? I have mixed feelings about using 443 as
a kitchen sink port but encrypting DNS seems like a good idea.
On 4/29/20 9:40 AM, Evan Hunt wrote:
Does BIND have a DoH plugin official?
Or is there any guide to customize that one?
Not yet, but we plan to have a DoH imp
> On Apr 29, 2020, at 11:06 AM, Michael De Roover wrote:
>
> On that subject, how about DoT? I have mixed feelings about using 443 as a
> kitchen sink port but encrypting DNS seems like a good idea.
We are planning to have DoT on the same timeline as DOH, so nobody has to
choose one or the o
Michael De Roover wrote:
> On that subject, how about DoT?
DoT is easier since you only need a raw TLS reverse proxy, and there are
lots of those, for example, nginx:
http://dotat.at/cgi/git/doh101.git/blob/HEAD:/roles/doh101/files/nginx.conf#l48
Note that if you enable DoT on port 853 on your
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 08:06:20PM +0200, Michael De Roover wrote:
> On that subject, how about DoT? I have mixed feelings about using 443 as a
> kitchen sink port but encrypting DNS seems like a good idea.
Native support by the end of the year, same as DoH. Also, there's a
sample configuration fo
10 matches
Mail list logo
