I'm really not sure about what the name of this feature I am going to
describe would be. I would probably call it an "overlay view". But I
am sure there are better names.
Imagine I have a BIND 9 server for the following network topology:
Network 1
192.168.1.0/24 -
Brian J. Murrell wrote:
>
> But the hosts on Network 1 and Network 2 need to resolve the same name
> (let's call it "gateway") to the address of their interface on Router.
> So that is, hosts on Network 1 want a query of "gateway." to resolve to
> 192.168.1.254 and hosts on Network 2 want a query
Yeah, it's hard to disagree on the "should" part but we all definitely have to
administer networks in an imperfect world... To my mind, when there's zero ipv6
connectivity beyond the LAN, it would be handy to not ask the firewall to
create 3x more TCP connections that it can never complete, and/
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 8:28 AM Brian J. Murrell
wrote:
> I'm really not sure about what the name of this feature I am going to
> describe would be. I would probably call it an "overlay view". But I
> am sure there are better names.
>
> Imagine I have a BIND 9 server for the following network t
The problem is that apparently[*] the machines in your network have default
IPv6 routes, but you don’t have IPv6 connectivity. Fix that and you don’t have
to apply any bandaids. I think we should just remove filter- in the next
release cycle of BIND 9, having the feature doesn’t do any good
... And please don't misunderstand; I'm not asking you to debug my network.
There are actually two parts here, one is what the clients are/n't doing with
the responses they receive, and that's sort of beside the point and came
up incidentally, They aren't really experiencing any issues or p
My terminology seems to be the issue here, so let me try and rephrase/elaborate
: )
> I'm sure that you can get Ansible to add / remove / modify the list of zones
> on the slave servers. But is that the best solution when BIND has something
> built in for doing the same thing?
I was not awar
Ah, allow me to apologize then. Since I did not see any mention as to why you
possibly didn’t think ansible would serve us well for this job I had wrongly
assumed you to had maybe demo’d or just got handed the task of automating in
your organization and didn’t have time to research or test it be
8 matches
Mail list logo
