Mark Andrews wrote:
> As for the NAT box that chooses those ports. If you can’t keep the
> original port it should choose a ephemeral port at random. Choosing a
> well known port is problematic for lots of reasons.
If I understand the documentation that was linked previously
https://www.cisco.c
Hello.
I am using the dig that was created during the compile of BIND 9.14.0 (Stable
Release) .
I am performing a dig command from and against localhost and that has
firewalled access to the Internet but am getting an exit status of 10 and the
following textual error:
Ø /var/named/bin/dig @
LeBlanc, Daniel James wrote:
>
> I am performing a dig command from and against localhost and that has
> firewalled access to the Internet but am getting an exit status of 10
> and the following textual error:
dig +trace simulates iterative resolution so it tries to connect to
authoritative serve
Hi there all,
I manually use nsupdate to make some changes to some of my zones -
most recently I had to add a bunch of reverse DNS records. These are
all very similar - the first octet changes, and then the target name
changes. Unfortuniatly nsupdate doesn't support readline, and so the
obvious "p
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 10:03:30AM -0400, Warren Kumari wrote:
> Hi there all,
>
> I manually use nsupdate to make some changes to some of my zones -
> most recently I had to add a bunch of reverse DNS records. These are
> all very similar - the first octet changes, and then the target name
> chan
Tony Finch wrote on 6/11/2019 4:23 AM:
Mark Andrews wrote:
As for the NAT box that chooses those ports. If you can’t keep the
original port it should choose a ephemeral port at random. Choosing a
well known port is problematic for lots of reasons.
If I understand the documentation that was l
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 10:59 AM Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 10:03:30AM -0400, Warren Kumari wrote:
> > Hi there all,
> >
> > I manually use nsupdate to make some changes to some of my zones -
> > most recently I had to add a bunch of reverse DNS records. These are
> > all
Thanks Tony - it is working now. :-)
Daniel J. LeBlanc, P.Eng., MBA, DTME | Senior Network Architect | Bell Canada
-Original Message-
From: Tony Finch [mailto:d...@dotat.at]
Sent: June-11-19 11:03 AM
To: LeBlanc, Daniel James
Cc: ML BIND Users (bind-users@lists.isc.org)
Subject: [EXT]R
About a week-and-a-half ago, I wrote into the list, looking for some
help configuring RPZ. I wanted to have a name server (zurg) in a special
network that, when queried for two specific hosts (andy and sid) in a
zone, would give replies from its own information, while forwarding on all
other
Hi David,
On 6/11/19 2:05 PM, David Bank wrote:
About a week-and-a-half ago, I wrote into the list, looking for some
help configuring RPZ.
Thank you for the follow up with details on how someone else could
reproduce this for themselves if they find themselves with a similar
need / desire.
Hi,
I've been running bind 9.12 on netbsd 7.2 without any issues.
The bind-9.12 package is now marked deprecated (eol) and we're encouraged to
upgrade to bind 9.14.
I've been giving it a few tries and, while my server seems to be working
normally with bind 9.14.2, it doesn't respond to rnd
11 matches
Mail list logo
