I've recently been investigating having a local slave copy of the root zone
on a caching/forwarder type server. I've even put the local slave copy of
the root zone into a separate view accessed via a different loopback
address. (An limited example of this exists on the ISC site)
My question is thi
Bob McDonald wrote:
> I've recently been investigating having a local slave copy of the root zone
> on a caching/forwarder type server.
I do this on my toy server for various strange reasons, and although it
has worked OK I'm not confident it's really solid enough for production.
If you are run
Thank you sir! I'll investigate the newer bind implementations.
Regards.
Bob
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 12:41 PM Tony Finch wrote:
> Bob McDonald wrote:
>
> > I've recently been investigating having a local slave copy of the root
> zone
> > on a caching/forwarder type server.
>
> I do this on my
On 08/15/2018 09:11 AM, Bob McDonald wrote:
I've recently been investigating having a local slave copy of the root
zone on a caching/forwarder type server. I've even put the local slave
copy of the root zone into a separate view accessed via a different
loopback address. (An limited example of
We have a couple of small domains whose DNS is served by BIND on our dedicated
machines. Almost 3 years ago we had set up DMARC records, and were getting
reports from various MXs every day until a couple of days ago (Aug 13). Then
they suddenly stopped!
Nothing in the BIND config or zone files
Doug Barton wrote:
>
> Slaving the root and ARPA zones is a small benefit to performance for a busy
> resolver, [...]
> This technique is particularly useful for folks in bad/expensive network
> conditions. While the current anycast networks of root servers is much better
> than it was "in the ol
In article you write:
>We have a couple of small domains whose DNS is served by BIND on our dedicated
>machines. Almost 3 years ago we had set up DMARC records,
>and were getting reports from various MXs every day until a couple of days ago
>(Aug 13). Then they suddenly stopped!
>
>Nothing in th
> BIND 9.14 will have an improved local root implementation (called a
> "mirror" zone) which validates the zone so you don't blindly serve bogus
> data. The feature is available now in the 9.13 dev branch; I have not
> tried mirroring the arpa zones - the docs suggest that isn't a supported
> confi
8 matches
Mail list logo
