Google search for "man named" turns up:
https://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/cur/9.9/doc/arm/man.named.html
which says (among more details):
named [-4] [-6] [-c config-file] [-d debug-level] [-E engine-name] [-f]
[-g] [-M option] [-m flag] [-n #cpus] [-p port] [-s] [-S #max-socks]
[-t direc
You may further be interested in Bind statistics for analysis of the
Bind server behaviour under load. Look at an example here what metrics
are avialable in general:
https://github.com/lukas999/bind2pmda
If you wanted to use even the PMDA, forget the github source as the PMDA
is now part of th
Just wanted to follow up 9.12.1b1 fixes this issue for me.
Thanks,
-Nick
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/l
I apologize, I sent the previous email in error. This is what I get for having
so many revisions of named sitting around on one server, I was not running
9.12.1b1 when I tested this. I will be more careful in the future. I just
tested this with 9.12.1b1 and it still fails, the same as 9.12.
I d
I've built
mysqld -V
mysqld Ver 10.2.14-MariaDB-log for Linux on x86_64 (Source
distribution)
I'm setting up encryption, following
https://mariadb.com/kb/en/library/encryption/
https://mariadb.com/kb/en/library/data-at-rest-encryption/
I created my key
sorry all.
coffee.
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
I'm sorry to keep replying to myself but I believe I've found the line of code
that is causing this issue. Looking at validator.c, in the check_deadlock
function, 9.12.0rc1 says:
...
if (parent->event != NULL &&
parent->event->type == type &&
Hello,
we are running bind-9.9.5 on Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS. bind was installed from
apt-repository (exact version is BIND 9.9.5-3ubuntu0.17-Ubuntu).
Today, named died suddenly with the following message:
Feb 22 17:32:28 ns1 named[1057]: adb.c:1142:
INSIST((adb->entries[bucket]).head == (entry)) fai
Hi
While testing the option "lame-ttl" with values 0 (disable) or any value
higher zero on our resolver, I'm unsure, if I missed something (BIND
9.11.2):
lame-ttl defines the time in seconds, how long a lame-server-entry
should be cached and therefore not should be further asked (because it
9 matches
Mail list logo
