Hello Experts,
Whats wrong with my second $ORIGIN here:
$ORIGIN lab.example.com.
$TTL 1d
@ IN SOA colombo root.lab.example.com. (
2003022720 ; Serial
56800 ; Refresh
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 07:02:52AM +, Harshith Mulky wrote:
> Whats wrong with my second $ORIGIN here:
>
>
> $ORIGIN lab.example.com.
> $TTL 1d
> @ IN SOA colombo root.lab.example.com. (
> 2003022720 ; Serial
>
Please read the error message *carefully*.
ns1.mail.lab.example.com.lab.example.com != ns1.mail.lab.example.com.
You are missing a terminating period on the MX record.
Mark
In message , Harshith Mulky writes:
> Hello Experts,
>
>
> Whats wrong with my second $ORIGIN here:
>
>
> $ORIGIN lab.exa
Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
>
> Missing a trailing period(.)
Here's a fun trick to avoid making this mistake: use FQDNs everywhere in
the zone file, and use the directive
$ORIGIN .
so that it doesn't matter whether you have the trailing . or not.
Downside, of course, is that you have to re
Am 14.09.2017 um 14:21 schrieb Tony Finch:
Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
Missing a trailing period(.)
Here's a fun trick to avoid making this mistake: use FQDNs everywhere in
the zone file, and use the directive
$ORIGIN .
so that it doesn't matter whether you have the trailing . or not
On 9/14/17 8:35 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> so that it doesn't matter whether you have the trailing . or not.
>>
>> Downside, of course, is that you have to repeat your domain name about a
>> gazillion times.
>
> scripting is the better answer
Dynamic zones is the better, better answer. 8-)
H
Am 14.09.2017 um 14:40 schrieb Alan Clegg:
On 9/14/17 8:35 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
so that it doesn't matter whether you have the trailing . or not.
Downside, of course, is that you have to repeat your domain name about a
gazillion times.
scripting is the better answer
Dynamic zones is
With BIND version 9.12 coming out - I'm wondering if I've missed any
announcements on some form of Automatic (DNS)Key Management?
Something that will create and retire keys according to some sort of policy.
Does anyone have nice and up-to-date cheat sheets of the easiest way to
do DNSSEC with BIN
Mark Elkins wrote:
> With BIND version 9.12 coming out - I'm wondering if I've missed any
> announcements on some form of Automatic (DNS)Key Management?
> Something that will create and retire keys according to some sort of policy.
See dnssec-keymgr (new in 9.11) which will automate ZSK managem
9 matches
Mail list logo