Hi again,
I have checked this again today.
Send & receive buffers are both 1MB, the Server has 8 CPUs and during
startup BIND is reporting this:
found 8 CPUs, using 8 worker threads
using 7 UDP listeners per interface
using up to 32768 sockets
We only have about 1.500 qu
On 06/29/2017 12:52 PM, Marc Richter wrote:
Hi again,
I have checked this again today.
Send & receive buffers are both 1MB, the Server has 8 CPUs and during
startup BIND is reporting this:
found 8 CPUs, using 8 worker threads
using 7 UDP listeners per interface
using up
Hi Dennis,
> Do you have any adjustments in /etc/system ?
No. And as mentioned before this is a Solaris 11 system, so /etc/system is
(mostly) irrelevant, as the IP settings are all done with ipadm now.
>
> # ndd -get /dev/ip \? | grep "read"
> # ndd -get /dev/tcp \? | grep "read"
>
That, as w
Hi,
What is the DNS name label length limit? As per RFC 1035, it is 63 characters.
I tested a few DNS names that contains a label that is longer than 63
characters, and found that these records were successfully loaded in RPZ zone.
I wonder if this is a BIND RPZ feature or bug (it allows DNS n
Jim Yang wrote:
>
> What is the DNS name label length limit? As per RFC 1035, it is 63
> characters. I tested a few DNS names that contains a label that is
> longer than 63 characters, and found that these records were
> successfully loaded in RPZ zone.
On the wire the length limit is 63. In pre
Hi Jim
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 01:57:16PM +, Jim Yang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the DNS name label length limit? As per RFC 1035, it is 63
> characters. I tested a few DNS names that contains a label that is
> longer than 63 characters, and found that these records were
> successfully loaded
Hi Mukund,
Yes, I will send the report with a sample RPZ zone that contains the name to
bind-b...@isc.org.
Thanks,
Jim
On 6/29/17, 2:40 PM, "Mukund Sivaraman" wrote:
Hi Jim
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 01:57:16PM +, Jim Yang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the DNS name label
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Marc Richter
wrote:
> Hi Dennis,
>
> > Do you have any adjustments in /etc/system ?
>
> No. And as mentioned before this is a Solaris 11 system, so /etc/system is
> (mostly) irrelevant, as the IP settings are all done with ipadm now.
>
> >
> > # ndd -get /dev/ip \
Hi Bob,
> I tend to distrust "CPU(30%)" if it is averaged over more than one
> cpu. Could you run "top" and hit the number "1" so that it shows each
> cpu separately? With 8 cpu's, "30%" could be one cpu at 100% and others
> lower, where the one cpu at 100% is your bottleneck.
I checked that w
Today ISC announced two significant BIND vulnerabilities (via our
bind-announce list -- https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-announce)
They are CVE-2017-3142 and CVE-2017-3143 and both are related to
errors in our TSIG support. These are unusual CVEs for BIND --
many of the vulnerabilities
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mapper/bind contains links to the source
rpms, and build instructions.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREKAAYFAllVdXcACgkQL6j7milTFsG/SQCggBDFBEwmgOb92nESct8cg3IS
gOoAn2KXPunBCbmHxvc
11 matches
Mail list logo
