In article ,
Elias Pereira wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Our scenario today consists of one:
>
> - DNS Server (Authoritative to our subdomains. Ex: www.mydomain.com*,
> moodle.mydomain.com, etc)
> - samba3 PDC server
> - Openldap server (user base for samba)
>
> All our IPs are public.
>
> This scenar
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 5:56 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
> Gordon Messmer wrote:
> ...
>
> > Is it considered best-practice (or just normal) for authoritative
> > servers to just not use the local server for resolution?
>
> Mine don't :-)
>
> Tony.
>
>
My authoritative servers are non-recursive. They
Greetings,
At ISC we've recently been discussing the idea of deprecating the
lightweight resolver interface as of BIND 9.12. This means removing lwresd
and liblwres, and deprecating the lwres statement in named.conf. (Note
that they would remain available in earlier releases; BIND 9.11 will be
su
Am 18.05.2017 um 23:13 schrieb Evan Hunt:
Greetings,
At ISC we've recently been discussing the idea of deprecating the
lightweight resolver interface as of BIND 9.12. This means removing lwresd
and liblwres, and deprecating the lwres statement in named.conf. (Note
that they would remain avail
4 matches
Mail list logo