> My plan is to have two remote, authoritative name servers
> (master and slave) for my owned domains. I would like to use rndc
> to control them from my local host.
>
> A couple of questions:
Tom,
I have a slightly unorthodox view on this which may even offer a bit more
security. The answers a
Am 29.08.2016 um 15:49 schrieb project722:
What about DKIM only? Can it be used instead of, or, as a "replacement"
for SPF? For example mails are signed with DKIM from the SMTP servers,
and the receiving servers are checking both SPF and DKIM. If the
receiving server detected a missing SPF woul
On Tuesday, August 30, 2016, Cathy Almond wrote:
> On 28/08/2016 02:48, Lyle wrote:
> > Use any in the allow stanza.
>
> You'll be using a shared key for this to work anyway, but I'd suggest
> being slightly more paranoid than 'any' in the allow stanza - perhaps
> the address range in which your
On Tuesday, August 30, 2016, Woodworth, John R <
john.woodwo...@centurylink.com> wrote:
>
> I have a slightly unorthodox view on this which may even offer a bit more
>
> security. The answers are listed below inline.
>
> ...
Thanks, John.
Best regards,
-Tom
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:56 PM, project722 wrote:
> I have successfully setup TSIG keys for "views" using a DNS master/server
> pair. Zone transfers are working as expected between the 2 servers for each
> view. Before we go live into production with this I need some clarification
> on a couple
System is a Mac mini (late-2009) running a new install of Mac OS X 10.11.6.
Installed OpenSSL 1.1.0 using:
./Configure --prefix=/usr/local shared darwin64-x86_64-cc
enable-ec_nistp_64_gcc_128 no-ssl2 no-ssl3
make depend
make test
sudo make install
No problems encountered. Then I tried to install
I personally avoid all Apple products like the plauge. Sadly, a iPhone 6s was
foisted upon me by my place of employment. Piece of junk. Hate it.
achem.
Surely you can find some normal hardware to install unix on and then BIND,
right? Or. How about throwing up a VM on the Mac and using that
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 02:02:45PM +1000, James Brown via bind-users wrote:
> System is a Mac mini (late-2009) running a new install of Mac OS X 10.11.6.
>
> Installed OpenSSL 1.1.0 using:
> ./Configure --prefix=/usr/local shared darwin64-x86_64-cc
> enable-ec_nistp_64_gcc_128 no-ssl2 no-ssl3
> m
Unnecessary hate.
OS X is a pretty standard Unix and it’s POSIX certified instead of Linux for
example.
BIND9 simply does not compile with OpenSSL 1.1 yet.
On Aug 31, 2016, at 01:20, John W. Blue
mailto:john.b...@rrcic.com>> wrote:
I personally avoid all Apple products like the plauge. Sadly
Heh. I did say "personally" and for me being locked out of doing what I want
to do when I want to do it really helps me decide between something that is
useful or junk. And besides, I am cheap.
As an aside .. I remember I went into coworkers office for the first time. It
was like a small s
OpenSSL changed the API between OpenSSL 1.0.2 and OpenSSL 1.1.0 and
it is not backwards compatible. Almost everything written for
OpenSSL 1.0.2 and earlier needs to be re-written for OpenSSL 1.1.0.
We have not yet completed that process.
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley,
11 matches
Mail list logo
