doubt about queries.log format

Hi, first of all sorry for my poor English. I would like to know if is possible to see in the queries.log output the ip address resolved, for example, this is one line from the queries.log: *18-Jul-2016 10:54:15.226 queries: info: client 10.1.116.27#10760 (update.microsoft.com

Re: SOA record not signed with new key at key-rollover

Nis Wechselberg wrote: > Am I getting it right that the rest of the zone is not (re)signed > because the current signature is still valid for some time? > > So if I were to set sig-validity-interval to a shorter value, this would > help with the issue? If you are testing out a fast rollover sche

Re: doubt about queries.log format

Manuel Ramírez wrote: > > I would like to know if is possible to see in the queries.log output the ip > address resolved No, it only logs the query not the answers. Have a look at passive DNS or dnstap if you want more detailed telemetry. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/ - I xn

Re: SOA record not signed with new key at key-rollover

Am 18.07.2016 um 12:48 schrieb Tony Finch: > If your rollover time is much shorter then you are testing something that > is more like an emergency unplanned rollover. At the moment I am merely testing in this "high-frequency" setup to get a good feeling for the mechanics and the interaction betwee

RE: Questions on how to setup Reverse DNS in bind 9

I haven't done it with GoDaddy but many providers WILL delegate reverse IPs to you if you request it. Personal editorial comment: Were it me I wouldn't use GoDaddy for anything. I detest GoDaddy because their whole business model seems aimed at forcing you to leap through hoops to do anything

Query on the Order in which RR are answered by Bind of Order/preference are Same

Hello Experts, I had a query on how the following Records can be ordered on how the Records are configured in the Zone file I have done 2 different Tests I have configured following records in the Zone file e164enum.net with TTL value as 0 2.7.5.2.7.9.2.5.3.1.8.e164enum.net. IN NAPTR 100 10 "

Re: Query on the Order in which RR are answered by Bind of Order/preference are Same

On 18.07.16 13:59, Harshith Mulky wrote: I had a query on how the following Records can be ordered on how the Records are configured in the Zone file I have done 2 different Tests I have configured following records in the Zone file e164enum.net with TTL value as 0 2.7.5.2.7.9.2.5.3.1.8.e164

Re: doubt about queries.log format

Thanks Tony for your answer, and is there any possibility using other category and/or debug level to obtain the record and the ip resolved in the same log entry? Regards Manuel 2016-07-18 12:50 GMT+02:00 Tony Finch : > Manuel Ramírez wrote: > > > > I would like to know if is possible to see in

Re: Questions on how to setup Reverse DNS in bind 9

On Sun, 17 Jul 2016, Spork Schivago wrote: > So, in the /var/named directory, I create a file > called: 0.117.238.104.in-addr.arpa > > The contents of 0.117.238.104.in-addr.arpa are as follows: > $TTL 1D > @       IN SOA  ns1.jetbbs.com. spork.jetbbs.com. ( >                                      

weird transfer-source problems with one DNS node

I'm having a weird problem where one of our DNS servers is not communicating on the expected transfer-source IPs (but the rest are). They're generally configured exact/similar, but there's obviously something causing a difference on the one node. We run four slave DNS as public NS (with private ma

Re: weird transfer-source problems with one DNS node

Ian Veach wrote: > > So, any ideas on why I would see that slave initiate transfers on it's OS > IP versus the transfer-source IP... especially when the other three work > fine? What does the log say about interface addresses? Which version of BIND are you running? Has the xfer interface been rec

Re: weird transfer-source problems with one DNS node

Der, sorry. Machines are all RHEL 6.8, running the BIND provided by RH: 9.8.2rc1-RedHat-9.8.2-0.47.rc1.el6 Restarting BIND (or even the OS) doesn't seem to change anything. I don't seem to have scan as an option for rndc. I assume it's in a newer version that RH doesn't yet provide for RHEL 6.

Re: weird transfer-source problems with one DNS node

In article , Ian Veach wrote: > So unless I'm crazy (possible, regardless)... named is reporting using 230, > but OS is showing 240 (and remote host logs confirm 240)!? Could something in iptables be transforming it at a lower level? -- Barry Margolin Arlington, MA ___

Re: weird transfer-source problems with one DNS node

I don't think my earlier response to this has made it past moderation, but an update: iptables looks pretty benign to me...: Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywherestate RELATED,ESTABLISHED ACCE

Re: weird transfer-source problems with one DNS node

Negative Ghostrider...: [root@foo:~]# iptables -t raw -nvL Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination [root@

Re: Questions on how to setup Reverse DNS in bind 9

Oscar, On point 4 there, At this time franklin.jetbbs.com ONLY RESOLVES TO 104.238.117.105 The way I wanted it was 104.238.117.105 AND 132.148.11.44to point to jetbbs.com but I think I setup the DNS record wrong. I just added another A record for jetbbs.com and added the IP address 132.1

Re: Query on the Order in which RR are answered by Bind of Order/preference are Same

In message <20160718141147.ga16...@fantomas.sk>, Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes: > On 18.07.16 13:59, Harshith Mulky wrote: > >I had a query on how the following Records can be ordered on how the Records > >are configured in the > Zone file > > > >I have done 2 different Tests > > > >I have confi