Hi John,
> whether we can force BIND to realize same Name Resolution ( A records) ,
> i search named.conf detail and *found the command ***rrset-order fixed )
> *will be suitable *, but fixed will be support by BIND 8 ,
>
> and i use BIND 9 now , if possible , please give me some advisement
Chec
Hello Graham:
Thanks for your advisement , you are right , and i search full choice at
options part again .
and sortlist will be suitable way . but i have to write long config at
sortlist
Thanks again
Have a good day with you .
:
> Hello Dear Sir :
>
> i have a question , i have run squid
What does bind try to do if the client specifies a udp size of less than 512?
I’ve been trying queries and here is what I’ve seen:
I have a query that ordinarily receives a response with an answer section
and an authority section, the response length being ~ 500.
If I specify a udp size of 200, t
In article ,
John Wobus wrote:
> What does bind try to do if the client specifies a udp size of less than 512?
> Iâve been trying queries and here is what Iâve seen:
>From RFC 6891:
Values lower than 512 MUST be treated as equal to 512.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6891#section-6.2.3
S
Hello Dear Sir :
when i check resolver.log just now , i found some error info about
( ipv6)
although i search some helpful info from ask.com , but i can't find the
config file , maybe the reason is i compiled via source file (
./configure --prefix=/mydic ).
Whether i need build the config
Just another broken nameserver that doesn't handle queries
correctly. It answers authoritatively for dlb.g5.letvlb.com/A but
returns a referral for dlb.g5.letvlb.com/ with unrelated
additional records.
Mark
% dig dlb.g5.letvlb.com @106.38.226.245
; <<>> DiG 9.11.0a1 <<>> dlb.g5.letvlb
6 matches
Mail list logo
