In article ,
Mark Andrews wrote:
> How do you actually expect this to ever work in real life?
I'm pretty sure Google DNS does this. Other resolver operators often get
complaints about "Why can't I look up through your DNS
servers when I can do it through Google DNS?"
> Caches will generally
On 18/03/16 14:52, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 10:04:05AM -0400, Thomas Schulz wrote:
I turns out that it is harder than I thought to allow incomming
connections from both providers at the same time, so I may not do
that after all.
Multiple route tables (and rules to choose the ap
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 3:03 AM, Barry Margolin wrote:
>
> That's feasible if you can reconfigure all the client machines to do
> this. It's not very scalable if you have a network of machines running
> different operating systems, and you'd like to have your central
> resolver take care of all th
Would they be receptive to letting you slave the zone? At least then you’d have
the whole EXPIRE time before the names stopped resolving.
If they’re concerned about security, then the transfers could be locked down by
source IP address, or, if their software supports it, TSIG key.
One of the do
4 matches
Mail list logo
