> Change the filenames on the slave, or just don't have a "file" option
> in the slave zone configuration.
I was going to yell "TIL from Evan, that 'file' is optional for a
slave", but
/etc/named.conf:545: zone 'example.com': missing 'file' entry
This is on 9.10.3. Did I misunderstand y
> I was going to yell "TIL from Evan, that 'file' is optional for a
> slave", but
>
> /etc/named.conf:545: zone 'example.com': missing 'file' entry
>
> This is on 9.10.3. Did I misunderstand you?
Do you use inline-signing? It's mandatory in that case (named needs to
know where to put t
> but I believe it's optional otherwise.
You are correct (of course). I had inline signing enabled.
For a non-signed zone I note the transfer indeed works without a 'file'
specification, and I note it's not stored on file anywhere (just in
core).
Thanks for clarifying.
-JP
_
Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
>
> For a non-signed zone I note the transfer indeed works without a 'file'
> specification, and I note it's not stored on file anywhere (just in
> core).
Yes, so (as you have probably guessed) the server has to retransfer the
zone from scratch when it is restarted. This migh
> This might make you sad if you have lots of zones or large zones.
.. or even just want to look at what was transferred (whitout having to
recurse to a `dig axfr').
I see no reason to omit 'file' (except on a diskless slave ;-)
-JP
___
Please
Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
> This might make you sad if you have lots of zones or large zones.
> .. or even just want to look at what was transferred (whitout having to
> recurse to a `dig axfr').
>
> I see no reason to omit 'file' (except on a diskless slave
Or if you care about availability, which is
Hi all,
I installed the latest version of bind-9.10.3-P2 but when I using dig EDNS
feature with +subnet, I found my local DNS can not carry client subnet,
does this version support EDNS0 now?
[root@test ~]# dig @8.8.8.8 www.google.com +subnet=8.8.8.8
; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P2 <<>> @8.8.8.8 www.googl
Hi Sury
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 10:50:39PM +0800, Sury Bu wrote:
> I installed the latest version of bind-9.10.3-P2 but when I using dig
> EDNS feature with +subnet, I found my local DNS can not carry client
> subnet, does this version support EDNS0 now?
9.10 branch as no support for ECS except d
On 1/5/16 6:26 AM, Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
>> This might make you sad if you have lots of zones or large zones.
>
> .. or even just want to look at what was transferred (whitout having to
> recurse to a `dig axfr').
>
> I see no reason to omit 'file' (except on a diskless slave ;-)
I ran into one e
In article ,
Alan Clegg wrote:
> On 1/5/16 6:26 AM, Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
> >> This might make you sad if you have lots of zones or large zones.
> >
> > .. or even just want to look at what was transferred (whitout having to
> > recurse to a `dig axfr').
> >
> > I see no reason to omit 'file' (
On 05/01/2016 17:03, Barry Margolin wrote:
> The in-memory copy is likely to end up in the swap partition.
A swap partition? I don't think I've seen one of those for years...
Ray
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to
Am 05.01.2016 um 18:03 schrieb Barry Margolin:
In article ,
Alan Clegg wrote:
On 1/5/16 6:26 AM, Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
This might make you sad if you have lots of zones or large zones.
.. or even just want to look at what was transferred (whitout having to
recurse to a `dig axfr').
I se
http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/190398/do-i-need-swap-space-if-i-have-more-than-enough-amount-of-ram
- Kevin
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists
Am 05.01.2016 um 19:05 schrieb Darcy Kevin (FCA):
http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/190398/do-i-need-swap-space-if-i-have-more-than-enough-amount-of-ram
and the answer is clearly NO if you have *enough* RAM
you just have to define the "enough"
which means your workload and your useful
and to finish that topic:
in days of zram (it's in the mainline kernel for a long time -
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/blockdev/zram.txt) when you
think you need some swap for whatever reason you use that just because
modern hardware has left so many cpu cycles left that it don't ne
OPENSSL_DIR
> > #endif /* OPENSSL_API_COMPAT */
> >
> > Users who want to make sure they are avoiding interfaces that are
> > deprecated with 1.1.0 can set OPENSSL_API_COMPAT to 0x1010L or
> > higher as appropriate.
>
>
> Tip of the iceberg.
&g
Hi Mukund,
Thanks for your reply, and do you know what bind version will support ECS
option?
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
> Hi Sury
>
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 10:50:39PM +0800, Sury Bu wrote:
> > I installed the latest version of bind-9.10.3-P2 but when I using dig
Hi Sury
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 02:35:37PM +0800, Sury Bu wrote:
> Hi Mukund,
>
> Thanks for your reply, and do you know what bind version will support
> ECS option?
BIND 9.11 will introduce authoritative support for ECS.
Mukund
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
18 matches
Mail list logo
