v 9.10.3 max-cache-size not recognised

2016-01-04 Thread MAYER Hans
Dear Users, I have a low end server with 1 GB of RAM running GNU/Linux version 3.4.104. I noticed that after a certain time the swap space is extensively used. This is normally not an issue but sometimes the system has long response times. I noticed that "named" is using a lot of memory. So I

Re: v 9.10.3 max-cache-size not recognised

2016-01-04 Thread Phil Mayers
On 04/01/16 13:54, MAYER Hans wrote: As you can see “named” is using 842 MB physical and 982 MB virtual memory. Much more than configured. Well, bind will use memory for things other than cache. Try accessing the statistics XML channel over HTTP with a browser; it'll render to HTML via style

Writeable file already in use

2016-01-04 Thread Sathyan Arjunan
Team, Recently, I updated my bind from 9.9.5 to 9.9.8-P2 from then I seen problems with me named configuration. Interestingly, I seen this problem only on my slaves NOT on Master DNS. I am using multiple zones pointing to a same file. This configuration has been in place for nearly 10 years with

Re: Writeable file already in use

2016-01-04 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 05.01.2016 um 01:13 schrieb Sathyan Arjunan: Recently, I updated my bind from 9.9.5 to 9.9.8-P2 from then I seen problems with me named configuration. Interestingly, I seen this problem only on my slaves NOT on Master DNS. I am using multiple zones pointing to a same file this is not supp

Re: Writeable file already in use

2016-01-04 Thread Evan Hunt
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 05:13:55PM -0700, Sathyan Arjunan wrote: > Recently, I updated my bind from 9.9.5 to 9.9.8-P2 from then I seen > problems with me named configuration. Interestingly, I seen this problem > only on my slaves NOT on Master DNS. > > I am using multiple zones pointing to a same