Hi,
Thanks Mukund for kind help. Problem has been resolved ..
Thanks & regards
Prakash Chand
- Original Message -
From: Mukund Sivaraman
Date: Monday, August 3, 2015 11:51 am
Subject: Re: ERROR : - writeable file 'data/udalgurijudiciarygov.hosts':
already in use: /etc/nicnet2007.gov
I wanted to understand how Order and Preference Values have an impact on the
answers Received from the DNS Server
I am asking because, I have 4 records for NAPTR Query, as below
carrier1.com 86400 IN NAPTR 50 50“s” “SIPS+D2T” ““
“_sips._tcp.carrier1.com.”
carrier1.com 86400 IN N
Am 03.08.2015 um 13:38 schrieb Harshith Mulky:
I wanted to understand how Order and Preference Values have an impact on
the answers Received from the DNS Server
I am asking because, I have 4 records for NAPTR Query, as below
carrier1.com 86400 IN NAPTR 50 50“s” “SIPS+D2T” ““
“_si
On 03/08/2015 12:38, Harshith Mulky wrote:
> I am expecting to receive the answer as _sip._udp.carrier1.com but i
> receive _sip._tcp.carrier1.com
>
> How could I change this?
For applications that use NAPTR records it's the job of the client
application to process and sort the entire set of NAP
Hi Harshith
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 05:08:50PM +0530, Harshith Mulky wrote:
> I wanted to understand how Order and Preference Values have an impact on the
> answers Received from the DNS Server
>
> I am asking because, I have 4 records for NAPTR Query, as below
>
> carrier1.com 86400 IN NAPTR
Am 03.08.2015 um 13:38 schrieb Harshith Mulky:
> I wanted to understand how Order and Preference Values have an impact on
> the answers Received from the DNS Server
>
> I am asking because, I have 4 records for NAPTR Query, as below
>
> carrier1.com 86400 IN NAPTR 50 50“s” “SIPS+D2T”
Am 03.08.2015 um 13:44 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>
>
> Am 03.08.2015 um 13:38 schrieb Harshith Mulky:
>> I wanted to understand how Order and Preference Values have an impact on
>> the answers Received from the DNS Server
>>
>> I am asking because, I have 4 records for NAPTR Query, as below
>>
>> ca
Am 03.08.2015 um 08:08 schrieb Mukund Sivaraman:
> Hi Prakash
>
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 10:14:50AM +0530, prakash wrote:
>> Aug 3 09:59:34 govindnsvm named[7436]: /etc/nicnet2007.govdomain:15424:
>> writeable file 'data/udalgurijudiciarygov.hosts': already in use:
>> /etc/nicnet2007.govdomain
Am 03.08.2015 um 16:50 schrieb Heiko Richter:
Am 03.08.2015 um 08:08 schrieb Mukund Sivaraman:
Hi Prakash
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 10:14:50AM +0530, prakash wrote:
Aug 3 09:59:34 govindnsvm named[7436]: /etc/nicnet2007.govdomain:15424:
writeable file 'data/udalgurijudiciarygov.hosts': alrea
Hi!
I'm hoping someone here can help me with a problem in my DNSSec
configuration.
I'm running Bind 9 in Debian Jessie and just finished configuring it
with DNSSec for my zones. Everything including automatic key rollover
for the ZSKs is working, except for a slight anomaly with my KSKs:
For som
On 03/08/15 16:50, Heiko Richter wrote:
Hi Heiko,
> Why use the "file" option at all on a slave?
If you don't use the "file" option on a slave, then BIND does not write
the zone to disk. This is okay for a small number of small zones. But if
you have many zones, or they are large, then you usual
Am 03.08.2015 um 16:59 schrieb Anand Buddhdev:
On 03/08/15 16:50, Heiko Richter wrote:
Hi Heiko,
Why use the "file" option at all on a slave?
If you don't use the "file" option on a slave, then BIND does not write
the zone to disk. This is okay for a small number of small zones. But if
you
Am 29.07.2015 um 10:59 schrieb Job:
> Hello,
>
> for a test page purpuose, we would like to avoid propagation only for a
> specific record A, example:
> test.domain.com
>
> We need to test if users set up our DNS server in ethernet configuration, and
> they display correctly the test page.
> Bu
This unfortunately looks like the thread for me to jump on to
I missed installing the last two 9.9...-p# patches, first time I built
everything and was pretty much ready to do it, and then forgot all about it
due to health issues. More recent one...I had got it built for Solaris x64
and w
14 matches
Mail list logo
