CAA RR type

2015-05-15 Thread rams
Hi. I have zone file as follows $ORIGIN rameshtest-caa.com. $TTL 86400 ; 1 day @ IN SOA ns1.rameshtest-caa.com. root.rameshtest-caa.com. ( 2009040114 ; serial 3600 ; refresh (1 hour)

Re: CAA RR type

2015-05-15 Thread Mukund Sivaraman
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 12:39:21PM +0530, rams wrote: > I am using bind 9.6. Did I miss/mistake anything here? Could you > please guide me to work for CAA. BIND 9.6 is unsupported. Please use a current version of BIND. Mukund pgpWkn0oAFeYC.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: CAA RR type

2015-05-15 Thread rams
Thank You Mukund . I figured that it is implemented in 9.10 Regards, Ramesh On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Mukund Sivaraman wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 12:39:21PM +0530, rams wrote: > > I am using bind 9.6. Did I miss/mistake anything here? Could you > > please guide me to work for CAA.

Re: CAA RR type

2015-05-15 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , rams writes: > Hi. > I have zone file as follows > > $ORIGIN rameshtest-caa.com. > $TTL 86400 ; 1 day > @ IN SOA ns1.rameshtest-caa.com. > root.rameshtest-caa.com. ( > 2009040114 ; serial >

Re: CAA RR type

2015-05-15 Thread rams
Thank You Mark. Now I am using 9.9 and It is working fine. Regards, Ramesh On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > > In message owv0s7...@mail.gmail.com>, rams writes: > > Hi. > > I have zone file as follows > > > > $ORIGIN rameshtest-caa.com. > > $TTL 86400 ; 1 day > > @

Re: shutting up logs

2015-05-15 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 15.05.2015 um 08:56 schrieb G.W. Haywood: Hi there, On Fri, 15 May 2015, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 15.05.2015 um 02:01 schrieb Nick Edwards: > skipping nameserver 'ns5.concord.org' because it is a CNAME, while > resolving '210.128-25.119.138.63.in-addr.arpa/PTR' > > I have logs grow by abou

Bind DLZ

2015-05-15 Thread Rob Hall
Hi all, I've been using Bind DLZ for quite some time now - the original Sourceforge code in various older versions of bind - and have had no issues with it. So as to move away from hand patching code and building custom packages I've tried to move to the packaged version of bind included in Cen

R: R: RPZ and client matching

2015-05-15 Thread Job
Hello, very interesting feature: >>We have prepared a branch that adds an "rpz-skipzone." policy action >>that, when matched by the trigger, behaves as if the current policy zone >>is disabled, and proceeds to the next one. It is still in the early >https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-use

Re: R: R: RPZ and client matching

2015-05-15 Thread Mukund Sivaraman
Hi Job On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 04:56:07PM +0200, Job wrote: > Hello, > > very interesting feature: > > >>We have prepared a branch that adds an "rpz-skipzone." policy action > >>that, when matched by the trigger, behaves as if the current policy zone > >>is disabled, and proceeds to the next one

R: R: R: RPZ and client matching

2015-05-15 Thread Job
Hi Mukund! I am very glad to try the features. Is there a way to assign a policy-zone to a list of client ip without excluding/passing them through? Simply assigning ip to RPZ policy zone! Thank you, Francesco Da: Mukund Sivaraman [m...@isc.org] Inviato

Future of BIND's built-in empty zone list

2015-05-15 Thread Warren Kumari
On Thursday, May 14, 2015, Rob Foehl > wrote: > On Thu, 14 May 2015, Chris Thompson wrote: > > Now that RFCs 7[5]34 & 7[5]35 have been published, how do ISC see the >> future >> of the seemingly ever-expanding built-in empty zone list in BIND? >> >> One possibility that seems plausible to me is t

Re: Future of BIND's built-in empty zone list

2015-05-15 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , Warren Kumari writes: > On Thursday, May 14, 2015, Rob Foehl wrote: > > > On Thu, 14 May 2015, Chris Thompson wrote: > > > > Now that RFCs 7[5]34 & 7[5]35 have been published, how do ISC see the > >> future > >> of the seemingly ever-expanding built-in empty zone list in BIND? > >>