Chris Buxton wrote:
>
> The BIND name server will not read /etc/resolv.conf (which is what that
> dns-nameserver line refers to), so set it to '::1'. Or whatever makes
> sense to you.
However! Since you are configuring BIND to be an authoritative-only
server, you want the local resolver to point
The other day I found that my secondary name servers running bind
where not dishing out
_msdcs. SRV records
This was causing join issues. It turned out that the Domain controller
had 2 different scopes one for
_msdcs.
and one for
so I shared the second _msdcs. scope with all my bind secondary
> zone "_msdcs." {
> [..]
> file "data/db.192.168.1.2.slave";
> };
> zone "" {
> [..]
> file "data/db.192.168.1.2.slave";
> };
Both zones are being backed by the same file, so one will be overwriting
the other. This may not be the cause of the half-working situation, but
it won't be helping. D
As of the time I am sending this, you can point your browser to
http://com.google and get a web page. How did they get com.google
to resolve?
Tom Schulz
Applied Dynamics Intl.
sch...@adi.com
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-us
Am 01.04.2015 um 20:42 schrieb Thomas Schulz:
As of the time I am sending this, you can point your browser to
http://com.google and get a web page. How did they get com.google
to resolve?
.google is just another new TLD
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 02:42:04PM -0400, Thomas Schulz wrote:
> As of the time I am sending this, you can point your browser
> to http://com.google and get a web page. How did they get
> com.google to resolve?
I'm sure it was not cheap.
Brace yourself! There are many here now, and more coming.
> I'm sure it was not cheap.
Peanuts compared to their buying .app for $25m. [1] Here's a list of the
other TLDs they've got so far: [2]
> Brace yourself! There are many here now, and more coming.
The list of delegated strings [3] increases almost daily, yes. (And I
can't stop laughing.)
You can do subdomains with the one zone file rather than having separate zones
you just have to put a new ORIGIN for the subdomain.
In the domain file for after the SOA and existing records (NS, A,
CNAME etc...) add a line:
$ORIGIN _msdcs..; New subdomain
Then add the records (A, CNAM
Lightner, Jeff would like to recall the message, "subdomain with domain".
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential
information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are
not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or u
In article ,
Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
> > I'm sure it was not cheap.
>
> Peanuts compared to their buying .app for $25m. [1] Here's a list of the
> other TLDs they've got so far: [2]
Some of them sound like more April Fools jokes.
>
> > Brace yourself! There are many here now, and more coming.
On 4/1/2015, Jeff Sadowski wrote
The other day I found that my secondary name servers running bind
where not dishing out
_msdcs. SRV records
This was causing join issues. It turned out that the Domain controller
had 2 different scopes one for
_msdcs.
and one for
so I shared the second _msdc
Remember to put check-names ignore to use underlined zones.
> On Apr 1, 2015, at 4:53 PM, Barry S. Finkel wrote:
>
> On 4/1/2015, Jeff Sadowski wrote
>> The other day I found that my secondary name servers running bind
>> where not dishing out
>>
>> _msdcs. SRV records
>>
>> This was causing
On 1 April 2015 at 20:53, Barry S. Finkel wrote:
> It would be a good idea to also have the other Active Directory
> "underscore" zones:
>
> __sites.
> _tcp.
> _udp.
>
> on your slave server.
>From what I've seen in the field, in most AD installations those
aren't actual subdomains
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Barry Margolin wrote:
> In article ,
> /dev/rob0 wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:34:42AM -0700, Frank Even wrote:
>> > In this particular instance, the masters ended up under maintenance
>> > shortly after these boxes rebooted, so they were unable to trans
I have a number of slave domains that I would like a naming scheme and
not have to go to each and change the filename.
I have the following zones
zone "1.168.192.in-addr.arpa" {
include "named.slave";
};
zone "2.168.192.in-addr.arpa" {
include "named.slave";
};
zone "3.168.192.in-
-Original Message-
From: Reindl Harald
Organization: the lounge interactive design
Date: Wednesday, April 1, 2015 at 2:44 PM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: Re: com.google how did they do that
>Am 01.04.2015 um 20:42 schrieb Thomas Schulz:
>> As of the time I am sending this, yo
.ibm, .cisco, .apple, .google, .sucks, .melbourne and many hundreds of others
have been applied for and hundreds already delegated into the root. '.hp' was
deemed too short (must be at least 3 characters).
See https://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus for the
new TLD's
In article ,
Jeff Sadowski wrote:
> I have a number of slave domains that I would like a naming scheme and
> not have to go to each and change the filename.
>
> I have the following zones
>
> zone "1.168.192.in-addr.arpa" {
> include "named.slave";
> };
> zone "2.168.192.in-addr.arpa"
Hi List,
I have faced the problem.
Firstly, I have 2 nameserver, the first nameserver is the
authoritative nameserver and not allow the recursive. The second one
is the recursive nameserver, and also store zonefile as the same with
the first server.
I have remove zonefile from the first server an
Do you really want help? If so stop obscuring the details.
Mark
In message
, Teerapatr
Kittiratanachai writes:
> Hi List,
>
> I have faced the problem.
> Firstly, I have 2 nameserver, the first nameserver is the
> authoritative nameserver and not allow the recursive. The second one
> is the
Mark,
Unfortunately, due to my company's policy, i cannot provide you the information.
Thank you for your help.
Te
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> Do you really want help? If so stop obscuring the details.
>
> Mark
>
> In message
> ,
> Teerapatr Kittiratanachai writes
21 matches
Mail list logo
