A record of domain name must be name server ?

Hi Everybody, The below item is our DNS (BIND) server configuration. our Domain* xxx.com *is assigned IP address 192.168.1.100 which is our one of DNS server. Can we change it to our web server IP address ? Because we want anybody access our domain *xxx.com * with

Re: A record of domain name must be name server ?

On 08.09.14 15:43, Pete Fong wrote: Subject: A record of domain name must be name server ? no. The below item is our DNS (BIND) server configuration. our Domain* xxx.com *is assigned IP address 192.168.1.100 which is our one of DNS server. Can we change it to our web server I

Re: A record of domain name must be name server ?

Hi Matus UHLAR - fantomas, Sorry, I do not understand the meaning of "It could only issue a problem if you pointed "example.com. NS example.com." or similar MX etc records." Do you mind to explain more details ? Thank you very much. Best Regards, Pete Fong 2014-09-08 16:06 GMT+08:00 Matus UHL

Re: A record of domain name must be name server ?

In article , Pete Fong wrote: > Hi Matus UHLAR - fantomas, > > Sorry, I do not understand the meaning of "It could only issue a problem if > you pointed "example.com. NS example.com." > or similar MX etc records." Do you mind to explain more details ? Thank > you very much. NS records tell ev

Re: A record of domain name must be name server ?

On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 03:43:22PM +0800, Pete Fong wrote: > The below item is our DNS (BIND) server configuration. our Domain* > xxx.com I think that is a porn site. If you mean to use that name as an example, please use "example.com" instead. Putting HTTP links to pornography in your emails

Re: A record of domain name must be name server ?

Based on the zone contents below, you shouldn't have any problem changing the 192.168.1.100 address to anything you want. But, of course, the zone is illegal because it only has 1 NS record published at the apex (there is a strict minimum of at least 2), and, as it stands now, if it is an Inte