Earlier this week, the OpenSSL project (http://openssl.org) announced
CVE-2014-0160, disclosing a very serious security flaw in the OpenSSL
library, affecting versions 1.0.1 and 1.0.2-beta (including OpenSSL
1.0.1f and 1.0.2-beta1) In many stories, this vulnerability is being
referred to as the "H
Apologies if this has been discussed; I searched the archives and didn't find
anything.
I'd like to know why the "search" and "domain" settings in the Windows
%systemroot%\system32\drivers\etc\resolv.conf don't seem to make a difference.
Anyone know?
Thanks.
Fred Woodbridge
___
On Apr 11 2014, Frederic Woodbridge wrote:
Apologies if this has been discussed; I searched the archives and didn't find
anything.
I'd like to know why the "search" and "domain" settings in the Windows
%systemroot%\system32\drivers\etc\resolv.conf don't seem to make a difference.
Anyone know?
Hello -
Is it possible to enable inline signing of a zone in 2 different views with 2
different keys?
I have the following config:
view "external" {
match-clients {
1.1.1.1;
};
zone "test.com." {
type master;
file "external.test.com.";
allow-update {
On Apr 9, 2014, at 4:14 AM, Steven Carr wrote:
However, assuming you are using views on the same IP address and not
splitting it across internal/external servers as that would screw up
NS records), you can reuse the same zone file so those zones that
appear in both internal and external views ref
On 11 Apr 2014, at 18:59, John Wobus wrote:
> On Apr 9, 2014, at 4:14 AM, Steven Carr wrote:
>> However, assuming you are using views on the same IP address and not
>> splitting it across internal/external servers as that would screw up
>> NS records), you can reuse the same zone file so those z
On 04/11/2014 10:59 AM, John Wobus wrote:
My understanding has been that two views that are masters for
a zone can safely share a zone file if the zone isn't dynamic (e.g.
dnsupdate, dnssec auto signing, etc), but that two views of
a slave zone shouldn't do that: you could have two
different vie
7 matches
Mail list logo
