Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> If you really want to go down this path then you need to copy over
> the shared library which is dynamically loaded into named at runtime
specifically lib/engines/libgost.so
> or rebuild openssl to include the gost code in libcrypto.
How do you do that? The documentation
On Feb 11 2014, David Newman wrote:
[...]
That's interesting. It seems to contradict Lucas' advice to "always use
'1 0 10' for these [NSEC3] flags, as fewer aren't secure enough and more
aren't any more secure."
It's difficult to see how that can make sense. Increasing the number of
iterations
I've been trying to run the regression tests for bind-9.9.5 and keep
getting lots of timeouts and errors in the system/inline test.
The procedure I'm using to build and run the tests is at
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/server/bind.html
For bind-9.9.4-P2, all the tests pass, but
## Bruce Dubbs (bruce.du...@gmail.com):
> I've been trying to run the regression tests for bind-9.9.5 and keep
> getting lots of timeouts and errors in the system/inline test.
I saw the same symptoms when packaging/testing bind-9.9.5. I traced
the issue to processes blocking in read() from /dev/
Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
## Bruce Dubbs (bruce.du...@gmail.com):
I've been trying to run the regression tests for bind-9.9.5 and keep
getting lots of timeouts and errors in the system/inline test.
I saw the same symptoms when packaging/testing bind-9.9.5. I traced
the issue to processe
In message <52fbd79b.4070...@gmail.com>, Bruce Dubbs writes:
> Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
> > ## Bruce Dubbs (bruce.du...@gmail.com):
> >
> >> I've been trying to run the regression tests for bind-9.9.5 and keep
> >> getting lots of timeouts and errors in the system/inline test.
> >
> > I saw
On 02/12/2014 11:16 AM, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
## Bruce Dubbs (bruce.du...@gmail.com):
I've been trying to run the regression tests for bind-9.9.5 and keep
getting lots of timeouts and errors in the system/inline test.
I saw the same symptoms when packaging/testing bind-9.9.5. I trac
On 02/12/2014 05:17 AM, Chris Thompson wrote:
On Feb 11 2014, David Newman wrote:
[...]
That's interesting. It seems to contradict Lucas' advice to "always
use '1 0 10' for these [NSEC3] flags, as fewer aren't secure enough
and more aren't any more secure."
It's difficult to see how that can
Recent maintenance releases of BIND (BIND 9.9.5, 9.8.7,
and 9.6-ESV-R11) were found to contain a defect preventing
the included dig, nslookup, and host utilities from exiting
properly when run on Microsoft Windows systems.
Only Windows systems were affected.
To address this regression, which was
## Doug Barton (do...@dougbarton.us):
> If you don't have enough random bits on your system to run these simple
> tests, your /dev/random is seriously underpopulated, and likely a
> security risk. You should definitely not put BIND in production compiled
> with the option you mention above.
Ou
10 matches
Mail list logo
