Hi all!
I just managed to "crash" Bind 9.9.5 with an assertion failure - see
attached log file.
What my script does is:
1. delete zone via rndc (in this case the zone does not exist)
2. add zone via rndc
3. rndc signing -nsec3param
4. rndc sign
5. rndc signing -nsec3param (this
Very strange, it got another assertion when starting Bind after the crash:
Feb 11 11:49:48 named[22328]: transfer of 'pernau.at/IN (unsigned)' from
88.198.53.113#53: connected using 11.22.33.28#46467
Feb 11 11:49:48 named[22328]: zone pernau.at/IN (unsigned): transferred
serial 84
Feb 11 11:49:
On Feb 10 2014, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message <52f94ee2.7080...@ksu.edu>, "Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng." writes:
[... snip ...]
On 02/06/14 15:07, Timothe Litt wrote:
[... snip ...]
> Note also the RFC 5155 recommendation:
>> The salt SHOULD be at least 64 bits long and unpredictable, so that
>
Hi
Is there any way to define a hostname and its static IP address in a
caching setup?
I would like to let bind answer queries about a small amount of hosts
even if there is no Internet connection available.
Thanks Göran
___
Please visit https://list
On 11.02.14 16:59, Göran Höglund wrote:
Is there any way to define a hostname and its static IP address in a
caching setup?
I would like to let bind answer queries about a small amount of hosts
even if there is no Internet connection available.
You can simply define locally managed DNS zone. T
We have been trying to build bind using with-openssl=PATH and not have it
require the full openssl install on the destination system. We had this setup
and running when we were building on solaris 9 using bind-9.9.2 up through
bind-9.9.4-P2. Now we are building on a Solaris 10 system (remote sys
Olsen, Richard William (Rick) CTR DISA PEO-MA (US) We have been trying to build bind using with-openssl=PATH and not have
> it require the full openssl install on the destination system.
Try building BIND with --without-gost
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/
Forties, Cromarty: East
On 2/11/14 7:38 AM, Chris Thompson wrote:
> On Feb 10 2014, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
>> In message <52f94ee2.7080...@ksu.edu>, "Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng." writes:
> [... snip ...]
>>> On 02/06/14 15:07, Timothe Litt wrote:
> [... snip ...]
>>> > Note also the RFC 5155 recommendation:
>>> >> The salt S
In message <52fa7d8e@networktest.com>, David Newman writes:
> > It's probably worth noticing what the big operators do, e.g.
> >
> > $ dig +noall +answer +nottl NSEC3PARAM com. edu. net. org.
> > com.IN NSEC3PARAM 1 0 0 -
> > edu.IN NSEC3PARAM
In message , "Olsen, Richard William (Rick) CTR DISA PEO-MA (US)" writes:
>
> We have been trying to build bind using with-openssl=PATH and not have it req
> uire the full openssl install on the destination system.
Why do people try to make things more complicated than they need
to be. Just ins
10 matches
Mail list logo
