Hi all,
Recently I encounter some problems with rndc.
Output of rndc command:
rndc: connection to remote host closed
This may indicate that
* the remote server is using an older version of the command protocol,
* this host is not authorized to connect,
* the clocks are not synchronized, or
* the
see bind arm 6.2.26 view Statement Definition and Usage
2013/12/30 Måns Hagström
> Hi,
>
> I'm running the same DNS for both my local and global adress-spaces. That
> is, when I'm on my local net, I want the DNS to reply with my
> local 192.168.0.1-address, and when users from the 'outside' gl
Dear All,
Kindly help me on my requirement.
Regards
Papdheen M
On Sunday, 29 December 2013 12:13 PM, babu dheen wrote:
Thanks Chris. Actually I am using latest version of BIND in RPM format
downloaded from RHN. I just need to configure RPZ with customized blackhole IP
address (manually
On 2 January 2014 10:47, babu dheen wrote:
> Kindly help me on my requirement.
What exactly are you wanting to do? There is lots of information on
the Internet already about implementing RPZ (Google is your friend)
and configuration examples in the BIND9.9 ARM (chapter 6.2.16.20).
If you can sh
I use views to manage about 500 "mirrored" (internal/external) zones and it
works fine.
> Use views
Views +1
Stefano.
-Messaggio originale-
Da: bind-users-bounces+stefano.chiesa=wki...@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-bounces+stefano.chiesa=wki...@lists.isc.org] Per conto di
Dnsbed O
> > Use views
>
> Views +1
When were views added to BIND? We started using using multiple servers in
BIND 4, and I don't recall views being available back then, but I didn't
configure the servers, just maintained the zones.
We're still using multiple servers for internal vs. external resolut
On Thu, 2 Jan 2014, wbr...@e1b.org wrote:
> When were views added to BIND? We started using using multiple
> servers in BIND 4, and I don't recall views being available back then,
> but I didn't configure the servers, just maintained the zones.
Views were introduced in BIND 9.0.0 (September 20
On Jan 2, 2014, at 9:19 AM, wbr...@e1b.org wrote:
>>> Use views
>>
>> Views +1
>
> When were views added to BIND? We started using using multiple servers in
> BIND 4, and I don't recall views being available back then, but I didn't
> configure the servers, just maintained the zones.
>
> We
On Dec 31, 2013, at 11:25 PM, Gaurav Kansal wrote:
> Thanks Chris for your useful comments.
>
> On Dec 30, 2013, at 9:46 PM, Gaurav Kansal wrote:
>>> I am getting the error message for lot of domains.
>>>
>>> Log of error entries are attached.
>>>
>> All the ones I checked were caused by
Hello,
Is it possible to make bind answering slowly to requests ?
Here is the context : we installed new DNS servers but some clients with
static IP configuration are still using the old ones.
We enabled queries logging to track the badly-configured workstations
and warned the persons but as
In message <52c5e922.6030...@nryc.fr>, "Nicolas C." writes:
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to make bind answering slowly to requests ?
>
> Here is the context : we installed new DNS servers but some clients with
> static IP configuration are still using the old ones.
>
> We enabled queries loggin
On 02 Jan 2014, at 16:37 , Alan Clegg wrote:
> On Jan 2, 2014, at 9:19 AM, wbr...@e1b.org wrote:
>
Use views
>>>
>>> Views +1
>>
>> When were views added to BIND? We started using using multiple servers in
>> BIND 4, and I don't recall views being available back then, but I didn't
>>
With today's hardware (virtualization, etc) it?s not very expensive to build
out new servers.
One caveat with using virtual servers. Make sure that the DNS server
on which the host machine relies is NOT the DNS server that is
virtualized on that host. The host machine needs to be up before
t
13 matches
Mail list logo
