On 19/12/2013 23:32, Daniel Lintott wrote:
> I have now tried recreating the zone file on the master, removed and
> re-added the configuration for the zone on both master and slave, yet
> still I am unable to transfer the zone.
>
> I have also added the following logging to the master server:
>
>
On 20/12/13 09:16, Cathy Almond wrote:
> Noting this in the master zone:
>> allow-transfer {
>> 192.168.5.2;
>> };
>
> Check that the slave actually is using that source address for the TCP
> transfer (which I grant would be odd to be different, if your othe
On 19.12.13 19:27, Daniel Lintott wrote:
The following is logged on the slave:
Dec 19 17:51:48 server2 named[7866]: transfer of
'5.168.192.in-addr.arpa/IN' from 192.168.5.1#53: connected using
192.168.5.2#47108
Dec 19 17:51:48 server2 named[7866]: transfer of
'5.168.192.in-addr.arpa/IN' from 192
On 20/12/13 11:12, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 19.12.13 19:27, Daniel Lintott wrote:
>> The following is logged on the slave:
>> Dec 19 17:51:48 server2 named[7866]: transfer of
>> '5.168.192.in-addr.arpa/IN' from 192.168.5.1#53: connected using
>> 192.168.5.2#47108
>>
>> Dec 19 17:51:48 ser
what's in logs on master?
On 20.12.13 11:21, Daniel Lintott wrote:
Nothing seems to be logged for any transfers on the master... even with
the following logging statement added
logging {
channel xfer {
file "/var/log/named/xfer.log";
print-category yes;
On 20/12/13 11:40, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>> what's in logs on master?
>
> On 20.12.13 11:21, Daniel Lintott wrote:
>> Nothing seems to be logged for any transfers on the master... even with
>> the following logging statement added
>>
>> logging {
>> channel xfer {
>> file "/va
This topic was disscused in 2009. But I don't know the final decision.
Please refer following site:
http://t4605.network-dns-bind9-dlz.dnstalk.us/missing-additional-section-t4605.html
From: houguang...@hotmail.com
To: sjc...@gmail.com
CC: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: RE: missing ‘additional
On 20 December 2013 14:18, houguanghua wrote:
> This topic was disscused in 2009. But I don't know the final decision.
> Please refer following site:
> http://t4605.network-dns-bind9-dlz.dnstalk.us/missing-additional-section-t4605.html
Looks like it is potentially a "bug" if you want to call it t
Has anyone been able to get Network Solutions to add DS records for
their domain? I am trying to get DS records added for my domain and
so far it looks like Network Solutions can not do that.
Tom Schulz
Applied Dynamics Intl.
sch...@adi.com
___
Please vi
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:04:59AM -0500, Thomas Schulz wrote:
> Has anyone been able to get Network Solutions to add DS records
> for their domain? I am trying to get DS records added for my
> domain and so far it looks like Network Solutions can not do that.
The last time this was asked here was
On Dec 20, 2013, at 10:38 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:04:59AM -0500, Thomas Schulz wrote:
>> Has anyone been able to get Network Solutions to add DS records
>> for their domain? I am trying to get DS records added for my
>> domain and so far it looks like Network Solutions
-Original Message-
From: Warren Kumari
Date: Friday, December 20, 2013 12:15 PM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: Re: Adding DS records
>On Dec 20, 2013, at 10:38 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:04:59AM -0500, Thomas Schulz wrote:
>>> Has anyone been able to g
> >> If I was a NetSol customer, I would ask them, "Why not?"
> >
> >And if I were a NetSol customer, I would ask myself, Why?
>
> If I were a capitalist, I'd vote with my wallet and go somewhere with the
> features I want.
Well, we started with them back when they were the only company registeri
> Any recomendations for another company for a .com domain in the US
Gandi.net
Great support, including DNSSEC:
http://wiki.gandi.net/en/domains/dnssec
http://doc.rpc.gandi.net/domain/reference.html
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Thomas Schulz wrote:
>> >> If I was a NetSol customer, I wou
FYI: web.com recently bought NetSol and at least one other Registrar that
escapes me at the moment. It might be worthwhile to see if any of their
companies do this as you might have an easier time transferring and avoid some
of the common games Registrars play to prevent it.
I heartily recom
On 20 December 2013 18:10, pgndev wrote:
> Gandi.net
> Great support, including DNSSEC:
Gandi only support DNSSEC if you host the DNS elsewhere, their DNS
servers do not support DNSSEC.
Steve
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013, Steven Carr wrote:
On 20 December 2013 18:10, pgndev wrote:
Gandi.net
Great support, including DNSSEC:
Gandi only support DNSSEC if you host the DNS elsewhere, their DNS
servers do not support DNSSEC.
Steve
gandi.net +1
I transferred from NS to Gandhi in December 1998
On 20 December 2013 18:37, David Forrest wrote:
> gandi.net +1
>
> I transferred from NS to Gandhi in December 1998. I don't know about their
> hosting of primary DNS but they do host a secondary of mine and it seems to
> resolve there with an aa flag:
Yep, secondary works, but they can't be a DN
AIUI, it is not their name servers (which clearly support the records when
secondary), it's their hefty customer UI and their support/helpdesk folks that
would require a non-cheap upgrade.
That said, I have spent most of a decade as a happy customer of register.com,
which was recently Borged by
> > gandi.net +1
> >
> > I transferred from NS to Gandhi in December 1998. I don't know about their
> > hosting of primary DNS but they do host a secondary of mine and it seems to
> > resolve there with an aa flag:
>
> Yep, secondary works, but they can't be a DNSSEC primary.
>
> Steve
We host t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 12:08 -0800, Leonard Mills wrote:
> That said, I have spent most of a decade as a happy customer of
> register.com, which was recently Borged by web.com (of which I know
> absolutely nothing as a customer).
I moved from register.
It might be a silly question - but have you checked how many instances
of named you have running on the master (thinking that you might not be
'talking to' the one you think you are)?
Cathy
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-us
In message , David Forrest
writes:
> On Fri, 20 Dec 2013, Steven Carr wrote:
>
> > On 20 December 2013 18:10, pgndev wrote:
> >> Gandi.net
> >> Great support, including DNSSEC:
> >
> > Gandi only support DNSSEC if you host the DNS elsewhere, their DNS
> > servers do not support DNSSEC.
> >
> >
On 20/12/13 21:59, Cathy Almond wrote:
> It might be a silly question - but have you checked how many instances
> of named you have running on the master (thinking that you might not be
> 'talking to' the one you think you are)?
>
There appears to only be one instance, from what I can see
[root@
New development versions of BIND are now available from
http://www.isc.org/downloads
BIND 9.9.5b1
Release Notes -- https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01074
BIND 9.8.7b1
Release Notes -- https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01076
BIND 9.6-ESV-R11b1
Release Notes -- https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01077
_
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 12:58 -0500, Thomas Schulz wrote:
>
> Well, we started with them back when they were the only company registering
> domain names. And up to now there were no problems (other than perhaps price).
>
and their highly unethical business practices, OK my experiences with
them
I think this has got to the point of running named in the
foreground with debugging on the master.
named -g -d 100
This will log everything to stderr.
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
27 matches
Mail list logo
