Re: chroot /var/run permissions

2013-08-28 Thread Carsten Strotmann
Hello John, jo...@primebuchholz.com writes: > > What I am I missing here? /var/named/var/run and > /var/named/var/run/named > have group write permissions, so it seems it *shouldn't* be > complaining, > and the resulting files should've been owned by named, shouldn't they? > If you are runni

Re: redirecting root hints to fake internal root server

2013-08-28 Thread Cathy Almond
On 27/08/13 21:28, Kevin Darcy wrote: > On 8/27/2013 1:07 PM, Colin Harvey wrote: >> My environment is firewalled from the real world. For queries on >> zones to which I'm not master, I want to recurse to a corporate >> server. nslookup some.internal.hostname.com internal.corporate.server >> work

nxdomain

2013-08-28 Thread Nick Edwards
Hi, In just testing a few things with our authoritative server, I made a typo, and, much to my surprise the server responds NXDOMAIN to requests from unauthed requesters, this used to return REFUSED, when did this error change? (bind 9.9.3-P2) ___ Pleas

Re: nxdomain

2013-08-28 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 28.08.13 23:13, Nick Edwards wrote: In just testing a few things with our authoritative server, I made a typo, and, much to my surprise the server responds NXDOMAIN to requests from unauthed requesters, this used to return REFUSED, when did this error change? (bind 9.9.3-P2) what typo? --

Re: redirecting root hints to fake internal root server

2013-08-28 Thread Kevin Darcy
On 8/28/2013 5:25 AM, Cathy Almond wrote: On 27/08/13 21:28, Kevin Darcy wrote: On 8/27/2013 1:07 PM, Colin Harvey wrote: My environment is firewalled from the real world. For queries on zones to which I'm not master, I want to recurse to a corporate server. nslookup some.internal.hostname.co

bind configuration/setup question

2013-08-28 Thread mm half
Hello, Setup bind-9.9.2-P2 on a solaris 10 system using zones (an oracle implementation of OS virtualization), with a dns data/configuration zone and a dns zone.   The dns data zone is on a private network and has the dns data tables for bind (directory where data files stored in named.conf opt

Re: bind configuration/setup question

2013-08-28 Thread Alan Clegg
On Aug 28, 2013, at 12:53 PM, mm half wrote: > 28-Aug-2013 12:12:37.565 general: info: reloading zones succeeded > 28-Aug-2013 12:12:37.572 general: notice: all zones loaded > 28-Aug-2013 12:12:37.573 general: notice: running > 28-Aug-2013 12:12:37.573 general: error: file.c:300: unexpected erro

Re: bind configuration/setup question

2013-08-28 Thread Alan Clegg
On Aug 28, 2013, at 1:29 PM, Alan Clegg wrote: > > I believe that what you are seeing is the result of BIND 9.9 doing more > things "automatically", including bringing in a set of DNSSEC trust anchors > (root and DLV) and not being able to create the file. > > You should be able to use the op

FW: subscribe in bind-developer

2013-08-28 Thread Nidal Shater
From: ngiw2...@hotmail.com To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: subscribe in bind-developer Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 16:59:18 + hi how can I subscribe in bind-developer channel ? (bind9 version ),,, because I want to modify bind code

Re: FW: subscribe in bind-developer

2013-08-28 Thread Steven Carr
The only public developer list that I'm aware of is for the upcoming rewrite of BIND, BIND 10... https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind10-dev Steve On 28 August 2013 19:07, Nidal Shater wrote: > > > > From: ngiw2...@hotmail.com > To: bind-users@lists.isc.or

Re: FW: subscribe in bind-developer

2013-08-28 Thread Jan-Piet Mens
> how can I subscribe in bind-developer channel ? (bind9 version ),,, > because I want to modify bind code bind-workers ? [1] -JP [1] https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-workers ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bi

the location of dig and named

2013-08-28 Thread Nidal Shater
when I typed dig or named ,,, what is the location of the executable program dig and named is ? ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mail

Re: the location of dig and named

2013-08-28 Thread Chris Buxton
On Aug 28, 2013, at 2:35 PM, Nidal Shater wrote: > when I typed dig or named ,,, what is the location of the executable program > dig and named is ? Your answer can be found with this command, available on many operating systems: which dig or: which named Regards, Chris Buxton

Re: the location of dig and named

2013-08-28 Thread Mike Hoskins (michoski)
-Original Message- From: Nidal Shater Date: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 5:35 PM To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org" Subject: the location of dig and named >when I typed dig or named ,,, what is the location of the executable >program dig and named is ? It will vary by platform, and you can

Re: the location of dig and named

2013-08-28 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013, Nidal Shater wrote: > when I typed dig  or named ,,, what is the location of the executable > program dig and named is ? Maybe one of these will help: command -v dig type dig which dig whereis dig command -v named type named which named whereis named There are many othe

Re: nxdomain

2013-08-28 Thread Nick Edwards
The typos was more of how I came about my request, forget the typo as such, it the actual answer, to use a more common well known name, if I type ~$ host www.undernet.org ns1 Using domain server: Name: ns1 Host www.undernet.org not found: 3(NXDOMAIN) Above should be, and I'm darn sure used to b

Re: nxdomain

2013-08-28 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , Nick Edwards writes: > The typos was more of how I came about my request, forget the typo as > such, it the actual answer, to use a more common well known name, if > I type > > ~$ host www.undernet.org ns1 > Using domain server: > Name: ns1 > > Host www.undernet.org not found: 3(N

Re: nxdomain

2013-08-28 Thread Nick Edwards
Mark, On 8/29/13, Mark Andrews wrote: > > In message > > , Nick Edwards writes: >> The typos was more of how I came about my request, forget the typo as >> such, it the actual answer, to use a more common well known name, if >> I type >> >> ~$ host www.undernet.org ns1 >> Using domain server: >

Re: nxdomain

2013-08-28 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , Nick Edwards writes: > Mark, > > On 8/29/13, Mark Andrews wrote: > > > > In message > > > > , Nick Edwards writes: > >> The typos was more of how I came about my request, forget the typo as > >> such, it the actual answer, to use a more common well known name, if > >> I type > >>

Re: nxdomain

2013-08-28 Thread Noel Butler
Hey Mark, Looks like it might be a bug, *BUT* a client utils bug, so I think his server is likely fine, he's panicking over what's reported not what's actually going on, I'm sure its not the intended response to display so I've just added bug rep on it, if you disagree, you can always nuke it :)

Re: nxdomain

2013-08-28 Thread Noel Butler
On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 11:52 +1000, Noel Butler wrote: > Hey Mark, > > Looks like it might be a bug, *BUT* a client utils bug, so I think > his server is likely fine, he's panicking over what's reported not > what's actually going on, I'm sure its not the intended response to > display so I've j

Re: nxdomain

2013-08-28 Thread Noel Butler
replying to ones self a few times in one day or a sign I need a break.. but... I think the issue is this Trying "www.undernet.org" Received 34 bytes from 198.147.21.12#53 in 348 ms Trying "www.undernet.org.ausics.net" Using domain server: Host www.undernet.org not found: 3(NXDOMAIN) it comes do

Re: nxdomain

2013-08-28 Thread Steven Carr
I think the short answer is don't use the host command, always use dig. Not sure how to find the version of host (none of the usual -V -v -h flags seem to work with it) but on my system (OS X 10.8) host returns refused for the same query... sjcarr@elmo:~ $ host www.undernet.org. ns1.ausics.net Us

Re: nxdomain

2013-08-28 Thread Noel Butler
Yeah, I went out for a bit, came back and fresh, decided to take another look, I got no further than looking at my own confs and it clicked this was an old bug, that _was_ fixed... I've updated my RT entry to reflect that. On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 07:47 +0100, Steven Carr wrote: > I think the short