Hi,
I am using BIND 9.6 to enable my application to act as a ENUM server.
The ENUM server performs routing and responds to ENUM NAPTR records.
The NAPTR responses are sent with a TTL zero without any authority
section. When I trigger a ENUM NAPTR load(using dig) with same digits, I
could see
Dear All,
We are building a server for recursive DNS Server, this server will be acted as
a cache for our network. (several user-side DNS Server will forward to this
server)
Using Ubuntu Server with latest BIND version, we are trying to have RPZ incuded
in this BIND, with around 800k blacklis
On 12 July 2013 11:11, Arie L. Putra wrote:
>
> Has anyone have experience, how RPZ with huge list will impact BIND
performance, will it reduce DNS response time? we have six DNS server that
will point to this server, each server is serving about 15Mbps of DNS
Traffic on peak hour.
>
> this server
On 12/07/13 11:11, Arie L. Putra wrote:
Has anyone have experience, how RPZ with huge list will impact BIND
performance, will it reduce DNS response time? we have six DNS server
that will point to this server, each server is serving about 15Mbps of
DNS Traffic on peak hour.
We don't have that
Along the same lines as that of ipv4 address:
i have the following zone file configuration for reverse lookup:
Goal: 192.168.100.128/26 to be directed to 10.213.246.15
In this, the network part it 192.168.100.128 and
network range is 191.168.100.129 - 191.168.100.190
in this specific case,
Hi there,
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013, Arie L. Putra wrote:
We are building a server for recursive DNS Server, this server will
be acted as a cache for our network. (several user-side DNS Server
will forward to this server) Using Ubuntu Server with latest BIND
version, we are trying to have RPZ incuded
In article ,
Steven Carr wrote:
> On 2 July 2013 14:42, Sam Wilson wrote:
> > Can anyone here give examples of the types of various software that will
> > not operate without a PTR record?
>
> There have already been numerous listings of software that require
> reverse lookups. SMTP being the
In article ,
Daniel McDonald wrote:
> On 7/2/13 8:42 AM, "Sam Wilson" wrote:
>
> > There may be a subtle language thing going on here. I read the original
> > post above as saying, literally, "you need PTR records because various
> > software tries to match A and PTR records". It doesn't say
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/12/2013 11:23 AM, Sam Wilson wrote:
> In article
> , Steven
> Carr wrote:
>
>> On 2 July 2013 14:42, Sam Wilson wrote:
>>> Can anyone here give examples of the types of various software
>>> that will not operate without a PTR record?
>>
>> Th
On Jul 12, 2013, at 09.14, sumsum 2000 wrote:
> Along the same lines as that of ipv4 address:
> i have the following zone file configuration for reverse lookup:
>
> Goal: 192.168.100.128/26 to be directed to 10.213.246.15
>
> In this, the network part it 192.168.100.128 and
> network r
Bind-users;
I have been asked to slave a /24 from a microsoft SOA, however, their
authority for the /24 is false in that they really only have authority
to 192/26.
Am I correct in that there is no way to slave said zone
[x.y.z.in-addr.arpa] but serve it as a different zone
[192/26.x.y.z.in-
On Jul 12, 2013, at 3:11 AM, Arie L. Putra wrote:
> We are building a server for recursive DNS Server, this server will be acted
> as a cache for our network. (several user-side DNS Server will forward to
> this server)
> Using Ubuntu Server with latest BIND version, we are trying to have RPZ
>
On Jul 12, 2013, at 9:09 AM, Michael Hare wrote:
> Bind-users;
>
> I have been asked to slave a /24 from a microsoft SOA, however, their
> authority for the /24 is false in that they really only have authority to
> 192/26.
>
> Am I correct in that there is no way to slave said zone [x.y.z.in-a
> From: Steven Carr
> It's very difficult to predict the impact on performance in general.
Yes, the reasonable tactic is to build a representative list of
queries from your query logs and use queryperf to hit a test server
with those 800K policy zone labels.
>
In a simple fowarding only name server config:
options {
forward first;
forwarders {
10.220.0.34;
10.220.0.38;
};
}
How does the named process determine when to use one forwarder or both
forwarders? I'm sniffing the traffic and on some queries, it goes for the
fi
On 12 July 2013 18:44, Jiann-Ming Su wrote:
> How does the named process determine when to use one forwarder or both
> forwarders? I'm sniffing the traffic and on some queries, it goes for the
> first one. On other queries, it goes for both. Thanks for any
> clarification.
>
BIND will query b
Sumsum--
Using the technique you document, you will need a zone for each of
128.100.168.192.in-addr.arpa through 190.100.168.192.in-addr.arpa
Or you might want to serve the entire class C 100.168.192.in-addr.arpa,
especially if you can get a feed for the zone excluding your portion.
Hope this
On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 16:31 +, Vernon Schryver wrote:
> Patches for both of those versions of RPZ speed improvements for some
> BIND9 releases can be with the BIND RRL patches by following the link
> labeled "Patch files for BIND9" on http://www.redbarn.org/dns/ratelimits
>
> Both of those
Hi,
Thanks for the information, really appreciate it,
In qps term, each of my server around 10k qps.
Currentlt now we are just using simple query logging to file, no syslog yet :(
BR,
Arie L. Putra
陈维文
-Original Message-
From: "Chris Buxton"
Sent: 7/12/2013 11:12 PM
To: "Arie L.Pu
> From: Noel Butler
> > BIND9 releases can be with the BIND RRL patches by following the link
> > labeled "Patch files for BIND9" on http://www.redbarn.org/dns/ratelimits
> >
> > Both of those versions are or will be in official BIND releases.
> > I've lost track of which releases have or will ha
20 matches
Mail list logo
