Hi!
I have several bind instances running on the same host. All of them use
the same logging prefix, e.g:
named[11926]: zone mydomain/IN: Transfer started.
named[11926]: transfer of 'mydomain/IN' from 2.3.4.5#53: connected using
2.3.4.5#44224
named[13479]: client 2.3.4.5#44224: transfer of 'm
Give each instance of named a unique name:
A-named, b-named, etc
- Original Message -
From: bind-users-requ...@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-users-requ...@lists.isc.org]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 08:00 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: bind-users Digest, Vol 1560, Issue 1
Send
Klaus Darilion wrote:
>
> Some software allows to configure the syslog prefix, but I couldn't find that
> for bind.
Rename the named executable.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/
Forties, Cromarty: East, veering southeast, 4 or 5, occasionally 6 at first.
Rough, becoming slight or
In article ,
Tony Finch wrote:
> Klaus Darilion wrote:
> >
> > Some software allows to configure the syslog prefix, but I couldn't find
> > that
> > for bind.
>
> Rename the named executable.
Assuming a Unix-like OS would having multiple links (hard or soft) have
the correct effect?
Sam
-
In article ,
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >> >In article ,
> >> > Charles Swiger wrote:
> >> >> Certainly. Various software performs what's called a double-reverse
> >> >> lookup
> >> >> to confirm that the A and PTR records match.
>
> >In article ,
> > Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >>
On 02.07.2013 14:59, Tony Finch wrote:
Klaus Darilion wrote:
Some software allows to configure the syslog prefix, but I couldn't find that
for bind.
Rename the named executable.
I would prefer a configuration options, but I guess I have to use this
workaround.
Tested with symlinks, it
Sam Wilson wrote:
> Tony Finch wrote:
> > Klaus Darilion wrote:
> > >
> > > Some software allows to configure the syslog prefix, but I couldn't
> > > find that for bind.
> >
> > Rename the named executable.
>
> Assuming a Unix-like OS would having multiple links (hard or soft) have
> the correct
On 2 July 2013 14:42, Sam Wilson wrote:
> Can anyone here give examples of the types of various software that will
> not operate without a PTR record?
There have already been numerous listings of software that require
reverse lookups. SMTP being the main one. Other services like IRC and
some data
On 7/2/13 8:42 AM, "Sam Wilson" wrote:
> There may be a subtle language thing going on here. I read the original
> post above as saying, literally, "you need PTR records because various
> software tries to match A and PTR records". It doesn't say "you need
> PTR records because some systems req
In article ,
Daniel McDonald wrote:
> The other place reverse DNS is routinely queried is SMTP. If you care
> enough to send mail, you should care enough to set up your reverse entries
> realistically so that spam filters will recognize that you are trying to
> actively manage your email server
On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 14:42 +0100, Sam Wilson wrote:
> Can anyone here give examples of the types of various software that will
> not operate without a PTR record?
>
Nope, and our entire reverse zone was externally inaccessible for many
months! (See previous posts on the bind9-users list from me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/02/2013 12:36 PM, John Horne wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 14:42 +0100, Sam Wilson wrote:
>
>> Can anyone here give examples of the types of various software
>> that will not operate without a PTR record?
>>
> Nope, and our entire reverse zone
On 7/2/13 9:35 AM, John Horne wrote:
On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 14:42 +0100, Sam Wilson wrote:
Can anyone here give examples of the types of various software that will
not operate without a PTR record?
Nope, and our entire reverse zone was externally inaccessible for many
months! (See previous pos
On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 12:02 -0700, Eduardo Bonsi wrote:
> On 7/2/13 9:35 AM, John Horne wrote:
> >
> > We were alerted to the problem because we got long delays (around 20
> > seconds) when accessing a site doing a reverse lookup. That service
> > then, no doubt the same as with SMTP, then proceede
On 02/07/13 21:02, Eduardo Bonsi wrote:
> I have been reading all your concerns about reverse FQDNS. In my
> example, we are a very small firm and I am the IT network admin
> responsible for configuring our server. One of the reasons I
> configured our server was because we deal with Photography,
On 7/2/13 12:46 PM, John Horne wrote:
On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 12:02 -0700, Eduardo Bonsi wrote:
On 7/2/13 9:35 AM, John Horne wrote:
We were alerted to the problem because we got long delays (around 20
seconds) when accessing a site doing a reverse lookup. That service
then, no doubt the same as
Hi,
I’m running BIND on CentOS 5.3 on 12 Cache only DNS Servers (recursive),
its BIND 9.3 its bit outdated yes, planning to upgrade to latest bind on
Ubuntu server along with the hardware.
These DNS Server sometime is serving around 17Mbps of DNS queries on peak
hour, 16 Cores, only around
All,
sorry if this is a repeating theme here... we are interested in utilizing
LDAP as a backend to BIND. Google gives conflicting information on whether
this is possible/recommended/etc. and I couldn't find anything in the
release notes, which doesn't bode well I suppose...
But anyhow: can someo
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 05:22:15PM -1000, Stephan Fabel wrote:
> All,
>
> sorry if this is a repeating theme here... we are interested in utilizing
> LDAP as a backend to BIND. Google gives conflicting information on whether
> this is possible/recommended/etc. and I couldn't find anything in the
>
On 07/02/2013 06:34 AM, Sam Wilson wrote:
In article ,
Tony Finch wrote:
Klaus Darilion wrote:
Some software allows to configure the syslog prefix, but I couldn't find
that
for bind.
Rename the named executable.
Assuming a Unix-like OS would having multiple links (hard or soft) have
t
20 matches
Mail list logo
