Nick wrote on 02/12/2013 10:00:27 PM:
> We have a pair of DNS servers running BIND behind a direct routing LVS
> director pair running keepalived. Let's call these two DNS servers A
> and B, and the VIP V.
Several years ago I was lucky enough to take the ISC class on bind. One of
my questions g
Dear WBrown,
Thank you for your helpful reply.
On 13/02/13 08:11 -0500, wbr...@e1b.org wrote:
Nick wrote on 02/12/2013 10:00:27 PM:
We have a pair of DNS servers running BIND behind a direct routing LVS
director pair running keepalived. Let's call these two DNS servers A
and B, and the VIP V
On 13/02/13 14:30, Nick Urbanik wrote:
I think that it is not necessarily always true that you should avoid a
load balancer. Every day, our DNS caches are answering about 140,000
queries per second. I think that it is rather hard to configure
resolvers to query only three machines yet still m
Nick Urbanik wrote:
>
> I think that it is not necessarily always true that you should avoid a
> load balancer. Every day, our DNS caches are answering about 140,000
> queries per second. I think that it is rather hard to configure
> resolvers to query only three machines yet still meet the dema
On 13/02/13 15:34, Tony Finch wrote:
Nick Urbanik wrote:
I think that it is not necessarily always true that you should avoid a
load balancer. Every day, our DNS caches are answering about 140,000
queries per second. I think that it is rather hard to configure
resolvers to query only three m
I am upgrading my server from bind-9.3.6 via Centos 5.5 to 9.8.2 in
Centos 6.3.
I have and will run bind chrooted and on my test setup I noticed a 'new'
subdirectory in the chroot tree:
/var/named/chroot/etc/named/
I cannot find any documentation as what is indended to be placed in this
sub
Can anyone tell help me figure out why this SOA is not changing no matter
what I do. The zone was edited and has a new SOA but no matter what I do
bind doesn't reload the zone with the new SOA. I tried rndc freeze/unfreeze
and still nothing. Short of reloading bind what else can I do.
TIA, Paul
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moskowitz
Date: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 10:53 AM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: chroot/etc/named/ directory?
>I am upgrading my server from bind-9.3.6 via Centos 5.5 to 9.8.2 in
>Centos 6.3.
>
>I have and will run bind chrooted and on my tes
On Feb 12, 2013, at 7:00 PM, Nick Urbanik wrote:
> We have a pair of DNS servers running BIND behind a direct routing LVS
> director pair running keepalived. Let's call these two DNS servers A
> and B, and the VIP V.
>
> They slave from a hidden master; let's call it M.
>
> I want to allow anoth
On Feb 13, 2013, at 9:22 AM, Paul A wrote:
> Can anyone tell help me figure out why this SOA is not changing no matter
> what I do. The zone was edited and has a new SOA but no matter what I do bind
> doesn’t reload the zone with the new SOA. I tried rndc freeze/unfreeze and
> still nothing. Sh
Haven't done it on RHEL/CentOS 6.x yet but in RHEL5 with the bind-chroot
installed I've always had:
/var/named/chroot as the jail for BIND.
/var/named/chroot/etc = Location of global config files such as named.conf
/var/named/chroot/var/named = Location of the zone files.
I don't see a /var/named
Also make sure you’ve incremented the serial number in the zone file by at
least 1.
From: bind-users-bounces+jlightner=water@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-bounces+jlightner=water@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of
Chris Buxton
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 12:58 PM
To: Paul A
Cc: b
On 02/13/2013 12:43 PM, Mike Hoskins (michoski) wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moskowitz
Date: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 10:53 AM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: chroot/etc/named/ directory?
I am upgrading my server from bind-9.3.6 via Centos 5.5 to 9.8.2 in
Cento
On 02/13/2013 01:44 PM, Lightner, Jeff wrote:
Haven't done it on RHEL/CentOS 6.x yet but in RHEL5 with the bind-chroot
installed I've always had:
/var/named/chroot as the jail for BIND.
/var/named/chroot/etc = Location of global config files such as named.conf
/var/named/chroot/var/named = Loca
On 10/24/2012 11:56 AM, Chris Buxton wrote:
On Oct 23, 2012, at 5:17 PM, Christian Tardif wrote:
Hi,
I have a strange BIND behaviour I don't know how to handle. As I don't exactly
know how to describe it, I'll rather explain what I did and what happens. But
not quite easy to follow.
In my t
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moskowitz
Date: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 2:15 PM
To: Mike Hoskins
Cc: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: Re: chroot/etc/named/ directory?
>>Having said all that, you might search the archives (SRPMS have been
>> provided by community members) or oth
On 02/13/2013 03:40 PM, Mike Hoskins (michoski) wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moskowitz
Date: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 2:15 PM
To: Mike Hoskins
Cc: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: Re: chroot/etc/named/ directory?
Having said all that, you might search the archives
LinkedIn
I'd like to include you in my network to share updates and stay in touch.
- Michel
Michel BESNARD
Network Architect for Access Networks at Orange France / FT
Paris Area, France
Confirm that you know Michel BESNARD:
https://www.linkedin.com/e/m1ka4g-hd4zjblg-5i/isd/110620
Chris this is not a dynamic zone, I do have NS RR. I had to completely
restart bind for it to work. No matter what I did with the serial it
wouldn't change. Never had to do this before so it's a bit odd.
Named-checkzone gave me no errors and rndc reload worked fine but the zone
wouldn't update.
On Feb 13, 2013, at 6:10 PM, Paul A wrote:
> Chris this is not a dynamic zone, I do have NS RR. I had to completely
> restart bind for it to work. No matter what I did with the serial it wouldn’t
> change. Never had to do this before so it’s a bit odd.
>
> Named-checkzone gave me no errors a
In message <00f701ce0a3f$5cc75db0$16561910$@net>, "Paul A" writes:
>
> Chris this is not a dynamic zone, I do have NS RR. I had to completely
> restart bind for it to work. No matter what I did with the serial it
> wouldn't change. Never had to do this before so it's a bit odd.
>
>
>
> Named-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 14:15 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I am not up to building on my own and the few extra repos I work with
> (EPEL and rpmfusion) do not have a newer version all ready for Centos
> 6.3.
You might try
http://www.five-ten-sg.com/
22 matches
Mail list logo
