On 10/25/2012 08:44 PM, Kevin Darcy wrote:
On 10/24/2012 6:02 PM, Phil Mayers wrote:
Hell, if you've got WINS running and broadcast netbios, I think it's
still possible to log in with *no* working DNS at all.
At the risk of getting *totally* off-topic, no-one who cares about
security or abou
The one thing I can think of off the top of my head is to ensure the child
subdomain is properly delegated in the parent. If you try to zone level
forward a child domain on a server that loads the parent it will ignore the
forward if it can see the child doesn't exist as a true delegation.
I assum
On 26/10/12 12:56, Ben Croswell wrote:
>
> The one thing I can think of off the top of my head is to ensure the
> child subdomain is properly delegated in the parent. If you try to
> zone level forward a child domain on a server that loads the parent it
> will ignore the forward if it can see the
The thing that brings me back to a delegation issue is the statement of
slaving an external version of the second level domain the internal DNS
server. I know if I was splitting a domain I would not put internal only
delegations external.
-Ben Croswell
On Oct 26, 2012 7:23 AM, "Sten Carlsen" wrot
Hi All: I have an SPF record for a domain, and I need to add an authorization
record for Godaddy as well. Is the correct syntax as follows (using shorthand
for origin):
TXT IN ("v=spf1 a mx ptr ip4:65.49.39.152/29 ~all"
"DZC=DlaVBmG")
(there is an extra space at the
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 06:08:32AM -0700,
enigmedia wrote
a message of 29 lines which said:
> TXT IN ("v=spf1 a mx ptr ip4:65.49.39.152/29 ~all"
>"DZC=DlaVBmG")
This is *one* TXT record made of two strings. Whether or not the SPF
standard mandates it, it would
In article ,
Frank Even wrote:
> I've recently had an issue that I'm having some issues finding
> information on solving.
>
> I have internal DNS resolvers...they act as recursive name servers for
> general internet queries, but we have forwarders explicitly defined
> for specific internal zone
On 10/26/2012 7:16 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 06:08:32AM -0700,
> enigmedia wrote
> a message of 29 lines which said:
>
>> TXT IN ("v=spf1 a mx ptr ip4:65.49.39.152/29 ~all"
>>"DZC=DlaVBmG")
>
> This is *one* TXT record made of two s
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 06:31:31AM -0700,
enigmedia wrote
a message of 34 lines which said:
> I wasn't sure if I was "allowed" to have more than one TXT record in
> a zone, and when I googled around the only references I saw were to
> concatenating multiple name-value pairs into a single recor
On 10/26/2012 7:37 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 06:31:31AM -0700,
> enigmedia wrote
> a message of 34 lines which said:
>
>> I wasn't sure if I was "allowed" to have more than one TXT record in
>> a zone, and when I googled around the only references I saw were to
>>
Hello Jeremy,
Thank you for your reply.
I plan to send more information to ISC when I have it - FYI
Looks like my response didn't make it out yesterday, so here is another attempt.
Please see my responses within below:
- Original Message -
> From: Jeremy C. Reed
> To: Fr34k
> Cc: Bi
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Barry Margolin wrote:
> In article ,
> Frank Even wrote:
>
>> I've recently had an issue that I'm having some issues finding
>> information on solving.
>>
>> I have internal DNS resolvers...they act as recursive name servers for
>> general internet queries, but w
12 matches
Mail list logo
