Re: getaddrinfo and TTL

2012-08-05 Thread Martin McCormick
Phil Mayers writes: > If you want TTL, you will need to use DNS-specific functions like the > res_* > API. You need to be sure you are querying the master, otherwise the TTL > will be the one from cache, not the "real" value. I appreciate this information as it sounds like I am using the

Multi-master DNS with Bind

2012-08-05 Thread john . debella
Hi, Looking to find information as to whether I can set up bind for multi-master DNS. I want to be able to update DNS records via any or more than one nameserver in the domain and have the records updated and propagated regardless if the "master" is available. Is this supported or are there ways

Re: Multi-master DNS with Bind

2012-08-05 Thread Evan Hunt
> Hi, > > Looking to find information as to whether I can set up bind for > multi-master DNS. I want to be able to update DNS records via any or more > than one nameserver in the domain and have the records updated and > propagated regardless if the "master" is available. Is this supported or > ar

Re: Multi-master DNS with Bind

2012-08-05 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello Evan Hunt, Am 2012-08-05 20:26:06, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: > Not at this time. We've discussed the subject at some length and it > may appear in a future release, but it's not on the near-term roadmap. Something for bind10? > BIND 9 does support update forwarding (i.e., slaves rec

Re: security BIND

2012-08-05 Thread Michael Hoskins (michoski)
-Original Message- From: Carsten Strotmann Date: Saturday, August 4, 2012 8:37 AM To: Alberto Rasillo Cc: "bind-users@lists.isc.org" Subject: Re: security BIND >On Sat, 4 Aug 2012, Alberto Rasillo wrote: > >> Hi what are recomendations regarding security and DNS service?Thnks > >it is

new bind 9.9 and root NS

2012-08-05 Thread dkole...@olearycomputers.com
Hi; I have a client who's migrating from an old bind 9.3 installation to a new bind 9.9. I've done the migration and everything seemed to be running fine. Before switching the internic pointers, though, the client gave it a good thorough trashing and they're finding some issues. On the new syst

Re: new bind 9.9 and root NS

2012-08-05 Thread Michael Hoskins (michoski)
-Original Message- From: "dkole...@olearycomputers.com" Organization: http://groups.google.com Date: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 2:16 PM To: "comp-protocols-dns-b...@isc.org" Subject: new bind 9.9 and root NS >I have a client who's migrating from an old bind 9.3 installation to a >new bind 9

Re: new bind 9.9 and root NS

2012-08-05 Thread Doug Barton
On 08/05/2012 23:05, Michael Hoskins (michoski) wrote: > This almost sounds like an upstream firewall or proxy with faulty protocol > "fixups". If you do a query and EDNS is blocked or improperly configured > a "fall back" will occur which causes queries to take longer or possibly > timeout. +1