Re: Error: already exists previous definition

2012-07-21 Thread Active Venture - Tom
Hi No, there's no duplicated directives in the zone file. For example, here's the zone for another domain with the same error and here are the only directives: $ORIGIN   x.com. $TTL   3600 Tom At 20-07-2012 09:56 PM +0100, Tony Finch wrote: On 20 Jul 2012, at 21:40, Active Venture - Tom wrot

Re: Error: already exists previous definition

2012-07-21 Thread Jan-Piet Mens
> 20-Jul-2012 15:26:40.181 config: error: > /var/named/etc/namedb/conf/zone_0.conf:1529: zone 'x.net': > already exists previous definition: > /var/named/etc/namedb/conf/zone_0.conf:1529 > 20-Jul-2012 15:26:46.270 general: error: reloading configuration > failed: failure That looks very suspic

Re: named validating @0x...: ... SOA: no valid signature found

2012-07-21 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 12-07-20 07:16 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > > "dnssec-validation auto;" Well, this seems to have done the trick. Changing it from yes to auto has eliminated most (almost all in fact) of the validation warnings/errors I was getting in my logs. > tells named to use the compiled >

Slave DNS

2012-07-21 Thread With No Name
Hello *, I have only one fixed IP from my ISP and run my own (Master) name server. A friend from me in another Network segment does the Slave. I do the same for him. Now I am puzzeling arround, whether it is possibel, to setup the slave DNS to accept any domains (including newly created) from a

Re: Slave DNS

2012-07-21 Thread Jan-Piet Mens
> I find it realy annoying, if I have ask every time the owner of the Slave, > to add a new zone. Assuming your version of BIND is new enough, look at `rndc addzone' with which you can add and remove zones at run-time w/out having to edit `named.conf'. -JP

Re: Slave DNS

2012-07-21 Thread With No Name
On Sat, July 21, 2012 20:03, Jan-Piet Mens wrote: >> I find it realy annoying, if I have ask every time the owner of the >> Slave, >> to add a new zone. > > Assuming your version of BIND is new enough, look at `rndc addzone' with > which you can add and remove zones at run-time w/out having to edit

Re: Slave DNS

2012-07-21 Thread Sten Carlsen
On 21/07/12 20:03, Jan-Piet Mens wrote: >> I find it realy annoying, if I have ask every time the owner of the Slave, >> to add a new zone. > Assuming your version of BIND is new enough, look at `rndc addzone' with > which you can add and remove zones at run-time w/out having to edit > `named.conf

Re: Slave DNS

2012-07-21 Thread Jan-Piet Mens
> Which mean, my DNS partner need his own rndc key which let him add/remove > zones as slave? You are the master. He is the slave. You have an rndc key for his slave server, so that you can add a slave zone on his server. [Substitute he/his by she/hers if required.] And vice versa. :) Grab a rec

[SOLVED] Re: Slave DNS

2012-07-21 Thread With No Name
I have gotten a sugestion which should work very well: 1) NS has apache SSL running 2) Create a script which add/remove zones to/from a "slave zones list" 3) run a cronjob which update the named_slave_zones.conf and reload named This give me the possibility to create more then one "slave zones

Re: Slave DNS

2012-07-21 Thread Jan-Piet Mens
> IIRC that will add the zone to the master, the question, as I heard it, > was to add it to the slave server, to avoid disturbing the owner of > the slave to manually editing the slave config. With `rndc addzone' you specify whether you are adding a master or slave zone, just as you would in na

Re: Slave DNS

2012-07-21 Thread Carl Byington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 2012-07-21 at 19:34 +0200, With No Name wrote: > I find it really annoying, if I have ask every time the owner of the > Slave, to add a new zone. Publish the list of zones which your friend should slave. That can be published any number of way